Author summary
15% 1 analyzed article/video 1,223 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Mendelson results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 214 hits . Analysis detected 1,524 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 16% (7,175 of 8,522 authors). This Aaron Mendelson is better (less manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group. Aaron Mendelson
Author details
Total words: 4,892
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.5% Composition/Division: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst