BS Summary: These 9e3f350350281ed3787212b32e822ea1 results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 230 hits. Analysis detected 2,091 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,144 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (3,357 of 4,901 authors). This 9e3f350350281ed3787212b32e822ea1 is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
9e3f350350281ed3787212b32e822ea1
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Sophia Gates0%
⁠0%SIMRAN PARWANI0%
⁠0%SILVIA STELLACCI0%
⁠1%Sergey Radchenko0%
⁠1%Robert Lloyd0%
⁠32%9e3f350350281ed3787212b32e822ea1 (selected)3%
⁠100%Kanoko Matsuyama54%
⁠100%Alex Horton56%
⁠100%Zahara Hill58%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt70%
⁠100%Bill Radke70%
Author details
Total words: 4,144
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
9e3f350350281ed3787212b32e822ea1 attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
9e3f350350281ed3787212b32e822ea1 vs All Other Publications
9e3f350350281ed3787212b32e822ea1 attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.