BS Summary: These 217ac5d24debb6b29f6f9d0b4eaac4bb results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Indoctrination, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 537 hits. Analysis detected 3,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (1,507 of 4,913 authors). This 217ac5d24debb6b29f6f9d0b4eaac4bb is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
217ac5d24debb6b29f6f9d0b4eaac4bb
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Sophia Gates0%
⁠0%SIMRAN PARWANI0%
⁠0%SILVIA STELLACCI0%
⁠1%Sergey Radchenko0%
⁠1%Robert Lloyd0%
⁠70%217ac5d24debb6b29f6f9d0b4eaac4bb (selected)4%
⁠100%Kanoko Matsuyama54%
⁠100%Alex Horton56%
⁠100%Zahara Hill58%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt70%
⁠100%Bill Radke70%
Author details
Total words: 3,368
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
217ac5d24debb6b29f6f9d0b4eaac4bb attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
217ac5d24debb6b29f6f9d0b4eaac4bb vs All Other Publications
217ac5d24debb6b29f6f9d0b4eaac4bb attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.