Raw Story93%

'Nobody wants this': Invitees bail on Friday night bash because Trump's too 'exhausting' 92%

By Alexander Willis88%

7/24/2026, 6:06:59 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 46.7% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 977 faulty-reasoning hits from 321 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 86.5% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,806 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 91.80% of the article peer group.

No one wants to go to President Donald Trump's big Friday night party, according to a new report. 
The White House Correspondents Dinner is expected to have terrible turnout after a gunman stormed the last one and journalists report mounting weariness over Trump, Politico reported Friday. 
“Nobody wants this," one White House reporter told Politico, speaking under the condition of anonymity, "other than Donald Trump." 
Another White House reporter said they, too, would be skipping the much-hyped event . 
“I would go if I were in town, but I don’t know  it’s just exhausting,” they told Politico. 
Among the reasons behind journalists’ decision to skip the event is Trump’s frequent attacks on the media, which include his administration issuing subpoenas to reporters, threatening journalists with jail time, and filing lawsuits against news organizations. 
One reporter described as a “prominent veteran journalist” told Politico that those attending Friday night’s event were “pretty unhappy about being there,” citing a growing “tension and unease” among reporters given Trump’s aggression toward media outlets. 
Beyond Trump’s hostility with the press, reporters also told Politico that events like “vacations, weddings and family commitments” were of a higher priority than attending the annual White House Correspondents Dinner. 
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told Politico that Trump's speech at the dinner "will be entertaining," promising it will be "unifying yet vicious, and serious yet hilarious." 
She also pushed back on the notion that reporters were skipping the event for any reason beyond scheduling conflicts. 
“Leavitt said the speech changed little from the version Trump planned to give in April,” Politico’s report reads. 
“He’ll address the original dinner’s events, she said, with a mix of gravity and humor. 
The White House expects most of the Cabinet and senior staff to attend; Leavitt said anyone missing has a scheduling conflict rather than a lack of enthusiasm.” 
Confirmation Bias
11.5%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
19.9%
Representativeness Heuristic
11.2%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
17.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
18.1%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
8.7%
Pessimism Bias
5.9%
Negativity Bias
46.7%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
5.9%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
14.3%
False Dilemma
8.4%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
32.4%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
19.9%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
5.9%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
24%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
37.1%
Quote-first Misdirection
4%
Biased Writer Voice
12.8%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

321 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.