NTD100%

Mullin: If You're Illegal, or vote Illegally... We'll Find You and We Will Charge You!100%

7/17/2026, 10:39:17 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Burden of Proof, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.6% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 787 faulty-reasoning hits from 190 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 100% (171 of 18,395 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 99.10% of the video peer group.

Mullin: If You're Illegal, or vote Illegally... We'll Find You and We Will Charge You! 
We're not trying to change the outcome. 
We're trying to make sure that Americanpeople can trust our voting system. 
Uh before and after the election, wewill scrub all election records lookingfor illegal aliens and those who areineligible to vote, includingthose that somehow votedyet they were deceased. 
If you're illegal and attempted to vote, or you tried to vote illegally for someone else, 
we willfind you and we will charge you. 
Illegal voter registration and illegalvoting 
both carry penalties up to 5 years inprison 
and up to $250,000in fines. 
We will pursue maximum pressure on this. 
To let you know, we will be proactively looking atuh um early voting and thenafter post-election, we will continue toscrub all those that did vote. 
Those states that don't participate with us,they have public records of those thatvoted, which is where we found the 
250,000 from the four states that don'tparticipate with us. We will go through 
those records one by one and we will 
pursue everybody. We will make sure that 
people know they can trust our elections. 
Confirmation Bias
13.2%
Anchoring Bias
9.5%
Availability Heuristic
21.2%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
15.9%
Framing Effect
29.1%
Loss Aversion
4.2%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
4.2%
Negativity Bias
47.6%
Self-Serving Bias
3.7%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
10.1%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
24.3%
Halo Effect
10.1%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
13.2%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
3.7%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
12.2%
False Dilemma
20.1%
Slippery Slope
18%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
18%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
27.5%
Begging the Question
16.4%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
10.1%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
33.3%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
6.9%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
40.2%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
3.7%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

189 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.