NBC News⁠99%

How well do NBC News correspondents know their Supreme Court cases? ⁠32%

5/16/2026, 3:53:26 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 338 faulty-reasoning hits from 306 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,456 of 16,813 videos). This video is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the video peer group.

Sam, in 2020, >> this way. 
>> Amy Stevens won a landmark case after you, sir. 
Sets major precedent for transgender rights. 
It's a huge case. 
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I recall. 
>> She'd been fired because she was transgender. 
Her employer didn't even try to hide it. 
Where did she get fired from? 
>> A. Yep. 
>> Funeral home. 
>> Yes. 
>> B. Church. Three. 
School. Four. Bakery. 
I could have sworn and I I could be mistaken on this, but there was someone who was attempting to be hired for for wedding services and the people getting married objected. 
>> Is that your final answer? 
My my answer is going to be bakery. 
Final answer. 
>> That is >> Was it church? 
>> Funeral home. 
>> Funeral home. School. Church. 
>> Bakery. 
>> School. School. 
>> Yeah, >> that would be incorrect. 
Where did Amy Stevens get fired from? 
Is it a >> a funeral home? 
>> I Yes, >> you already know this. 
>> It's a funeral home. 
Wasn't Wasn't Amy like funeral director or something? 
>> I don't even have to give her multiple choice. 
>> She already knows. 
>> You know what? She's not a household name, but her case is huge. 
>> Yes. 
>> The bakery case that you're thinking about a different Supreme Court. 
So, you're not completely off base there. 
>> Was I closer than some of my colleagues? 
>> You're going to have to tune in and find out. 
Tune in on Saturday because I got to talk to Amy Stevens lawyer, the one who won the landmark case. 
His name is David Cole. 
He's a constitutional lawyer. 
You don't want to miss it. 
Here's the scoop. 
Supreme Court edition on Saturdays. 
A+ student over here. 
Confirmation Bias
14.4%
Anchoring Bias
2.6%
Availability Heuristic
17%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
8.5%
Framing Effect
29.7%
Loss Aversion
2%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
2.6%
Self-Serving Bias
2.9%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
2.9%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
2.6%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
2.3%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
7.8%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
10.5%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
4.6%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

306 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.