NTD100%

Trump: If I Wasn't Elected, There Probably Wouldn't be Israel, and Middle East! 100%

7/24/2026, 5:00:00 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 46.6% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 1,055 faulty-reasoning hits from 253 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 100% (153 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 99.30% of the video peer group.

If I thought they were anywhere near getting a nuclear weapon. 
If I didn't come if I wasn't elected Israel would in my opinion not be around anymore. 
They would have been hit by a nuclear weapon. 
And that includes right at the beginning with Barack Hussein Obama's nuclear deal that was so bad with Iran. 
That was a road to a nuclear weapon. 
And maybe even more so the B-2 bombers. 
If that plane right there, that plane, that beautiful plane, the wing carries the largest bombs in the world. 
If that bomb didn't go over there 17-hour flight and it hit every one of those bombs hit their target and the target was an airshaft at 2:00 in the morning. 
It's hard to believe, right? 
Going at very tremendous speeds. Every one of them hit and blew it to hell. 
If that didn't happen, they would have had a nuclear weapon and there would be no nuclear weapon and there would be no Israel. 
Israel. 
If I wasn't here, if I wasn't president, there would be no Israel and 
there probably would be no Middle East 
and you saw that 
when they shockingly started shooting at everybody all over the Middle East. 
If they had a nuclear weapon, they would have used that. 
There might not be a 
Middle East as we know it today. 
But 
they're definitely, in my opinion, there would not have been an Israel. 
Confirmation Bias
8.7%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
9.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
40.3%
Framing Effect
12.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
2.8%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
19.4%
Negativity Bias
46.6%
Self-Serving Bias
17%
Fundamental Attribution Error
4.3%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
7.5%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
7.5%
Primacy Effect
7.5%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
12.3%
False Dilemma
31.6%
Slippery Slope
8.7%
Circular Reasoning
9.5%
Hasty Generalization
21.7%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
1.6%
Appeal to Emotion
36%
Begging the Question
4.3%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
25.3%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
24.5%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
26.1%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
32%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

253 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.