Security at San Diego mosque 'delayed' shooters and saved lives, official says 98%

5/19/2026, 11:20:40 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Halo Effect, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 50.8% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 218 faulty-reasoning hits from 126 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 97.1% and a BS Rank of 98% (418 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 97.50% of the video peer group.

The individuals that did this heinous act ran past the security guard, most likely not knowing he was there. 
He immediately observed the threat to everybody at the mosque. 
He began to engage them with gunfire. 
Both suspects returned fire. 
You can see the security guard reach for his radio and put out the lockdown protocol. 
The security guard then continued to engage in a gun battle with these two suspects. 
His actions, without a doubt, delayed, distracted, and ultimately deterred these two individuals from gaining access to the greater areas of the mosque where as many as 140 kids were within 15 ft of these suspects. 
Tragically, he died in that gun battle. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
50.8%
Overconfidence Bias
28.6%
Framing Effect
9.5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
5.6%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
15.1%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
19.8%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
15.1%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
28.6%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

126 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.