Fox News98%

New Jersey anti-ICE protests are ‘MORONIC’: Tomi Lahren #shorts #news #foxnews #us 94%

5/31/2026, 4:30:28 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 70.6% saturation with 185 hits. Analysis detected 2,276 faulty-reasoning hits from 262 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 89.4% and a BS Rank of 94% (1,424 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 93.50% of the video peer group.

I don't know. Maybe I I could see that one coming. 
>> Yeah, they gave them another weapon, 
right? I would also say to the point about this being well funded. We're going to talk to Nick Schwartter, of course, again later and get more information on that. But where do you go to pick up a shield like that? Do you just go to the Home Depot? Like, where's your riot section? I don't think so. So, somebody is paying for this. We know this and Nick's going to report more on this later. 
This is wellunded. But what we're seeing now, it might be peaceful. 
It's still a ritual of morons standing there parading around saying, "Let the criminally illegal aliens out into our community." I mean, this is moronic at best. 
best. These people, I'm happy that they're peaceful right now, but they are still morons. 
Okay. And when we have Democrats that are so like Mikey Cheryl, the governor, so stunned that this devolved into chaos and violence, what part of that is stunning to you? What part of your rhetoric and your fellow Democrats, what part of that did you not understand was adding to the problem, fueling the fire and enabling and also advancing this notion that somehow the people inside are being abused or oppressed because the cinnamon oatmeal wasn't hot enough this morning. I mean, this is just ridiculous. This is the best the left has to offer. I'll tell you what. 
Confirmation Bias
32.1%
Anchoring Bias
29.4%
Availability Heuristic
33.6%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
4.2%
Framing Effect
4.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
4.6%
Negativity Bias
63.7%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
48.9%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
48.9%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
16%
Halo Effect
5.7%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
67.9%
Primacy Effect
4.6%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
59.2%
Straw Man
48.9%
Appeal to Authority
29.4%
False Dilemma
29.4%
Slippery Slope
38.5%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
41.2%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
59.2%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
38.5%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
70.6%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
36.3%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
43.1%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
10.3%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

262 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.