CBS News97%

Investigation launched into swastika flag raised on NYU campus during graduation week 97%

5/15/2026, 12:23:44 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 66.4% saturation with 158 hits. Analysis detected 880 faulty-reasoning hits from 238 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 95.7% and a BS Rank of 97% (531 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 96.80% of the video peer group.

to New York now where graduation week at 
NYU was marred by a swastika flag flying above one of the university's buildings. 
It was immediately taken down and New York police are investigating. 
CBS News 
reporter Jared Oacher spoke with NYU students and has been covering anti-semitic incidents in New York City. 
>> A flag with swastikas was flown on top of an NYU building during graduation week. 
It was seen on a flag pole overlooking Washington Square Park during a graduation ceremony. 
It resembled a purple version of an Israeli flag with the Star of David in the center and two swastikas on either side. 
And this comes right on the heels of something that happened earlier this month in Queens where anti-Semitic graffiti was drawn on a synagogue and private homes. 
I spoke with students on NYU's campus today who told me they found this incident to be despicable. 
Another student said that while it's bad, he is not too surprised considering the varying opinions that live on NYU's campus. 
And another student told me it's not a good look for the school, considering all of the families and kids who were there for the graduation ceremonies. 
An NYU spokesperson said in a statement that we are shocked and deeply troubled by this hateful symbol expressing anti-semitism. 
Back to you, 
>> Jared. Thank you. 
Confirmation Bias
11.3%
Anchoring Bias
3.4%
Availability Heuristic
27.7%
Representativeness Heuristic
16%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
4.6%
Framing Effect
26.1%
Loss Aversion
11.3%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
66.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
8.8%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
11.3%
Primacy Effect
7.1%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
21%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
20.2%
Red Herring
8.8%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
45%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
21%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
11.3%
Appeal to Nature
5.9%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
20.6%
No True Scotsman
8.8%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
13%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

238 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.