Wildfire smoke covers New York, Chicago and much of the US East Coast 99%

7/17/2026, 12:07:55 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Burden of Proof, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 538 faulty-reasoning hits from 150 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 99% (191 of 17,634 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 98.90% of the video peer group.

I'm a public health nurse and I follow the air quality and heat announcements and I'm only out cuz I have to run a quick errand otherwise I'd be inside. 
I'm 72. 
I'm healthy but I know what air particles do to the body and um I wish more people were wearing masks and little babies and children were inside. 
>> Yeah, it looks like there's some wildfires coming from Canada and it's a bit overwhelming. 
I had to run to the store and buy myself a mask and a mercy inhaler and I was not expecting this. 
I do have asthma but it really comes out but something like this will definitely trigger it. 
So I wanted to be 100% certain I wouldn't have to like, you know, run to the ER or anything like that. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
19.3%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
27.3%
Framing Effect
8.7%
Loss Aversion
14.7%
Status Quo Bias
20%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
33.3%
Negativity Bias
18.7%
Self-Serving Bias
31.3%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
1.3%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
14.7%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
21.3%
False Dilemma
14.7%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
33.3%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
33.3%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
35.3%
No True Scotsman
11.3%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
8.7%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
11.3%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

150 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.