NBC News⁠99%

Trump recalls being evacuated after WHCD gunshots ⁠89%

4/27/2026, 11:52:00 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Pessimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 51.8% saturation with 101 hits. Analysis detected 643 faulty-reasoning hits from 195 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 82.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,933 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 88.50% of the video peer group.

It looked chaotic at one point. You were 
down. What was happening? 
>> Well, what happened is uh it was a little bit me. I wanted to see what was happening and I wasn't making it that easy for him. 
I wanted to see what was going on. And by that time, we started to realize maybe it was a bad problem, different kind of a problem, bad one, and different than what would be normal noise from a ballroom which you hear all the time. 
And uh I was surrounded by great people and I probably made them act a little bit more slowly. 
I said, "Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Let me see. Wait a minute." So, 
you know, I'm telling guys >> just at that moment where it looks like you go sort of down with the service. You were telling them to wait. 
>> Well, I know what happened is then I started walking with him. 
I turned I started walking and they said, "Please go down. Please go down on the floor." 
So I went down and first lady went down also. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
2.1%
Availability Heuristic
11.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
23.6%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
6.7%
Framing Effect
14.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
23.6%
Negativity Bias
4.1%
Self-Serving Bias
24.1%
Fundamental Attribution Error
14.4%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
5.1%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
9.7%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
23.6%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
23.6%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
21%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
9.7%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
2.1%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
12.8%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
51.8%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
23.6%
Personal Incredulity
14.4%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
7.7%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

195 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.