NBC News⁠99%

Marine veteran fights off teen carjackers ⁠90%

6/5/2026, 9:01:29 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 496 faulty-reasoning hits from 263 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 83.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (2,252 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 89.70% of the video peer group.

JacobĀ BordaĀ wasĀ workingĀ onĀ hisĀ truckĀ inĀ hisĀ quietĀ neighborhoodĀ inĀ suburbanĀ MarylandĀ whenĀ heĀ noticedĀ aĀ groupĀ ofĀ teenagersĀ walkĀ by.Ā 
>>Ā TheyĀ startĀ puttingĀ hoodiesĀ on.Ā IĀ likeĀ IĀ feltĀ somethingĀ isĀ goingĀ toĀ happen.Ā 
>>Ā SurveillanceĀ videoĀ fromĀ theĀ MarineĀ veteransĀ homeĀ securityĀ cameraĀ showsĀ oneĀ ofĀ theĀ teensĀ pullĀ aĀ gunĀ andĀ stickĀ itĀ inĀ Borda'sĀ face.Ā 
>>Ā IĀ toldĀ himĀ IĀ raisedĀ myĀ handsĀ upĀ andĀ theĀ keysĀ areĀ in,Ā carĀ isĀ on,Ā andĀ heĀ sawĀ myĀ phone.Ā 
HeĀ wasĀ like,Ā "GiveĀ meĀ yourĀ phone,Ā too."Ā 
>>Ā ButĀ thenĀ hisĀ hand-tohandĀ militaryĀ combatĀ trainingĀ kickedĀ in.Ā 
ItĀ wasĀ thatĀ splitĀ momentĀ whenĀ heĀ movedĀ hisĀ handĀ fromĀ myĀ headĀ toĀ theĀ sideĀ ofĀ myĀ head.Ā 
That'sĀ whenĀ IĀ grabbedĀ himĀ andĀ pullĀ itĀ uhĀ pullĀ itĀ myĀ way.Ā 
>>Ā YouĀ canĀ seeĀ BortaĀ wrestlingĀ theĀ teenĀ withĀ theĀ gunĀ toĀ theĀ ground.Ā 
HisĀ brotherĀ rushesĀ inĀ toĀ help.Ā 
ListenĀ asĀ theĀ gunĀ firesĀ duringĀ theĀ struggle.Ā 
InĀ theĀ midstĀ ofĀ theĀ melee,Ā theĀ teen'sĀ gunĀ wentĀ off,Ā butĀ fortunately,Ā noĀ oneĀ wasĀ hurt.Ā 
TheĀ onlyĀ gunshotĀ endedĀ upĀ hereĀ inĀ theĀ truck.Ā 
Borta'sĀ fatherĀ thenĀ chargesĀ inĀ rightĀ behind.Ā together.Ā 
TheĀ familyĀ subduingĀ theĀ teens.Ā 
PoliceĀ sayĀ twoĀ suspectsĀ onĀ theĀ sceneĀ wereĀ takenĀ intoĀ custody.Ā 
WasĀ thereĀ anythingĀ inĀ theĀ backĀ ofĀ yourĀ mindsĀ likeĀ maybeĀ theseĀ guysĀ messedĀ withĀ theĀ wrongĀ dude?Ā 
>>Ā Nothing.Ā ThatĀ theĀ firstĀ thingĀ IĀ thoughtĀ wasĀ howĀ amĀ IĀ goingĀ toĀ workĀ ifĀ they'reĀ goingĀ toĀ takeĀ myĀ car?Ā 
That'sĀ theĀ firstĀ thingĀ IĀ 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
5.7%
Representativeness Heuristic
3.8%
Hindsight Bias
10.6%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
14.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
6.5%
Pessimism Bias
5.7%
Negativity Bias
20.9%
Self-Serving Bias
21.7%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
3%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
8%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
13.3%
False Dilemma
6.8%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
17.1%
Begging the Question
5.7%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
3.8%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
4.2%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
20.5%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
13.7%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
3%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

263 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.