Fox News97%

McEnany SOUNDS OFF on Jill Biden's stunning admission #foxnews #news #us #fox 100%

5/29/2026, 12:00:09 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Bandwagon, and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 68.6% saturation with 120 hits. Analysis detected 804 faulty-reasoning hits from 175 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 100% (152 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 99.10% of the video peer group.

That is not the reaction of someone who believes they just watched their husband have a stroke. 
It it is an absolute lie. 
It was fraud what she did. 
Fraud on the American public. 
And she's continuing it by saying she had never seen him like that before or after. 
Dana, you'll remember Carl Bernstein who said he talked to people who knew Joe Biden, loved Joe Biden, supported Joe Biden, and they were adamant that what we saw was not a one-off. 
They said it had happened 15 or 20 times prior, him losing his train of thought. 
He described a fundraiser where he froze up and seemed to have some type of rigor mortise. 
This is not something that was a one-off. 
There is reporting and vast reporting. 
If you don't believe me with that one, Olivia Newsy, the conspiracy of silence, where reporters debated how dead the president appeared in 2020 and they settled on 40%. 
This was well known. 
Confirmation Bias
68.6%
Anchoring Bias
22.3%
Availability Heuristic
9.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
13.7%
Framing Effect
19.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
61.7%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.1%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
2.9%
Halo Effect
18.9%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
13.1%
Straw Man
9.1%
Appeal to Authority
43.4%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
26.3%
Red Herring
16.6%
Bandwagon
48%
Appeal to Emotion
45.1%
Begging the Question
5.7%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
3.4%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
18.9%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

175 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.