BS Summary: This video contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 31.3% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 1,024 faulty-reasoning hits from 361 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 84.7% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,698 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 89.90% of the video peer group.
I like that the Pope is an advocate for peace.
I think that's certainly one of his roles.
On the other hand, how can you say that God is never on the side of those who wield the sword?
Was God on the side of the Americans who liberated France from the Nazis?
Was God on the side of the Americans who liberated Holocaust camps and liberated those innocent people from, you know, those who had survived the Holocaust?
I I I certainly think the answer is yes.
And I agree. Jesus Christ does not I agree.
Jesus Christ certainly does not support genocide.
Whoever yelled that out from the dark, he certainly does not.
I think that's pretty easy. I think that's a a pretty easy principle.
>> Okay. So So here's a guy. Let me just say this.
Th This is a guy No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
First of all, random dude who's shouting, can I finish my point and then I'll respond to what you just shouted?
Is that okay?
>> Okay.
>> Yeah. Can we give him one second to to answer this?
>> So, let me just finish this question on the Pope and then I want to respond to what this guy said.
So, number one, the when when the when the Pope says that God is never on the side of those who wield the sword, there is the thousand year more than a thousand-y year tradition of just war theory.
Okay.
Now, we can of course have disagreements about whether this or that conflict is just.
But I think that it's important in the same way that it's important for the vice president of the United States to be careful when I talk about matters of public policy.
I think it's very very important for the pope to be careful
when he talks about matters of theology.
And I think that one of these issues here is that there has been is again,
hey, random dude screaming, I told you I'd respond to your point. I just want to respond to this question
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.