Louisiana father kills 7 of his children and another child in shooting 93%

4/20/2026, 12:18:12 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Burden of Proof, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 46.2% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 664 faulty-reasoning hits from 273 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 88.3% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,303 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 92.30% of the video peer group.

So, the house behind us is is where we 
had a very significant and catastrophic 
event this morning. 
It is where eight 
children were killed this morning. 
They 
range in ages from about 18 months to 
about 12 years of age. 
Our officers responded, located the eight individuals, the children that were dead, and we they tried to provide aid where they could, but ultimately were unable to save any of them. 
There was a child that jumped off the roof. 
We were able to get him to a hospital, 
and he is expected to survive. 
There's also two adult females that were injured during this mass shooting. 
They are both in critical condition. 
We are hopeful that they will survive. 
One is significantly more critical than the other. 
So, the suspect shot the mother of the child for the children first, 
then responded to this location and shot eight children, seven of which being his own. 
There was an additional child at this residence that was not akin to him. 
After doing this shooting, carjacked a vehicle just just down the road at West 79th and Linwood, 
and ultimately our officers were forced to neutralize the suspect. 
>> And you see lots of people on the street 
here that are gathering for prayer and mutual support, and that's what communities need to do in this circumstance. 
It lets you know that evil 
still exists in the world, and that we need to be fighting everything we can to overcome that that evil with good, to 
shed light in the darkness. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
4.8%
Availability Heuristic
12.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
5.5%
Hindsight Bias
6.2%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
13.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
7%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
6.6%
Pessimism Bias
4.4%
Negativity Bias
46.2%
Self-Serving Bias
18.3%
Fundamental Attribution Error
4.8%
Actor-Observer Bias
11.4%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
7%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
7%
Appeal to Emotion
35.5%
Begging the Question
10.6%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
11%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
15%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
3.3%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
12.5%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

273 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.