NBC News99%

Suspect in shooting at WHCD displayed anti-trump sentiments in writings 100%

4/26/2026, 9:26:25 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 55.1% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 914 faulty-reasoning hits from 227 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 100% (105 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 99.40% of the video peer group.

We're learning that the suspect, charging past security armed with a 
shotgun and pistol, was likely targeting various members of the Trump administration, including the president himself, according to that attacker's own writings. 
>> The suspect, whose name is Cole Thomas 
Allen, a 31-year-old of an LA suburb called Torrance, was staying at the hotel. 
He was a guest. He had checked in, according to officials, on Friday, and he did send a note to his family ahead of when he attempted this, where he apparently apologized for what he was 
about to do. But very notably, Hallie, he also wrote about the lack security at the hotel, according to some of these excerpts that we were able to review, saying that he even expected to encounter more security. 
Now, we should point out that he did have specific words about overall Trump administration officials, and that that was a potential motivator here, but he did not mention President Donald Trump by name. 
He referred to the president and leader in a more general way, but he did not specify that he was targeting him necessarily. 
Now, according to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, according to White House Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt, they are characterizing this and taking this as a potential attempt on the president's life. 
Confirmation Bias
38.3%
Anchoring Bias
4.8%
Availability Heuristic
41.9%
Representativeness Heuristic
6.2%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
19.8%
Framing Effect
29.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
15%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
41.9%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
9.7%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
20.3%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
42.7%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
4.8%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
4.4%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
15.9%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
55.1%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
6.2%
Anecdotal
16.7%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
10.1%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
10.1%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
9.7%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

227 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.