NBC News⁠99%

Singer D4vd arrested in murder of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas ⁠99%

4/17/2026, 6:29:38 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 40.5% saturation with 98 hits. Analysis detected 849 faulty-reasoning hits from 242 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 98.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (281 of 16,813 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 98.30% of the video peer group.

Right here in Los Angeles, LAPD has arrested the singer David, who's also known as a 21-year-old David Burke for the murder of Celeste Rivas. 
Now, this is a major update in an investigation into the death of a 14-year-old whose decomposed body was found in the trunk of David's Tesla last September. 
The question has always been, why has he not been named a suspect? And today, he's arrested. 
>> Yes. And I can't tell you why it took so long, but he was arrested today on suspicion of murder. 
He has not been charged. 
So, this is going to be presented to the DA on Monday, so we might get some charges on Monday. 
it's serious because obviously we know it's on suspicion of murder. So, he might be charged with murder. 
We knew that they had done interviews. 
We knew there was a grand jury. 
We knew they had canvas for video in the area, but they never arrested him like you mentioned. 
And everybody sort of questioned this in terms of, yeah, she was in his Tesla, it was his car, why is he not arrested quickly? 
And he wasn't. 
And we don't have an answer as to why, but we do know that he had been the focus of this investigation because of the relationship, because of his Tesla. 
months and months later, we now have this arrest. 
Confirmation Bias
40.5%
Anchoring Bias
9.5%
Availability Heuristic
33.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
10.3%
Hindsight Bias
10.7%
Overconfidence Bias
16.9%
Framing Effect
25.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
2.1%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
7%
Negativity Bias
22.7%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
30.2%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
3.7%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
8.7%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
13.2%
False Dilemma
7%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
18.6%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
10.3%
Appeal to Emotion
22.7%
Begging the Question
7.4%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
12.4%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
20.2%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
10.3%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
7.4%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

242 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.