Fox News99%

TRUMP: Lindsey Graham got 'the last laugh' #trump #shorts #politics #friends 93%

7/28/2026, 4:30:34 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50.8% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 866 faulty-reasoning hits from 181 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 85.4% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,791 of 25,563 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 93.00% of the video peer group.

As you remember, Lindsay and I did not exactly get off to the best of starts running against each other. 
Back in 2016, Lindsay said something rather nasty on his flight to becoming the next president of the United States. 
So, naturally, I did something that I shouldn't have done. 
I shared his personal cell phone number with the millions of people that happened to be watching that particular day. 
as I made a speech, a very important speech, and I remember the number 20228 0292 if anybody wants to give it a shot. 
His phone exploded. 
He said, "I had that number for 20 years. 
His phone totally I don't know what he did with it, but it exploded." 
That was the beginning of a friendship in a way. 
But it was Lindsay who had the last laugh because while I blew up his phone all for one day, we became great friends. 
And Lindsay did not stop calling me for the next 10 years. 
It was not easy. 
Confirmation Bias
22.1%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
30.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
11%
Overconfidence Bias
24.3%
Framing Effect
32%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
26.5%
Self-Serving Bias
34.3%
Fundamental Attribution Error
11%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
11%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
5%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
14.4%
Primacy Effect
13.3%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
11%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
13.3%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
6.6%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
50.8%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
26.5%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
48.1%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
6.1%
Biased Writer Voice
37%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
43.6%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

181 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.