Fox News⁠97%

Dem SHOCKS with comments on Vance's 'brown kids' #shorts #us #news #foxnews #Dems ⁠48%

4/22/2026, 12:30:14 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50.9% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 960 faulty-reasoning hits from 269 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,811 of 16,813 videos). This video is better (less manipulative) than 52.40% of the video peer group.

Far left US Senate candidate for Michigan Abdul El-Sayed has been firing off radical and offensive comments in 
recent weeks. He's done it for a while, 
but these are about Vice President J.D. Vance's family. 
The thing about J.D. Vance is the charisma of a doorknob. 
Here's the thing, what do you think is going through Usha's head when he talks? 
She's like, "Damn, I have to sleep with him." 
>> [laughter] 
>> I mean, you like I I mean, I guess she's pregnant, so I guess I guess something's happening, but like Yeah, like you got to imagine like truly zero charisma. 
Something tells me they both have bad breath, but it's just just a feature of watching people who say nasty things. 
Well, it didn't stop there. 
But he's got to look at his kids and be like, "Yeah, those are brown kids." 
They're mine. You know what I mean? And 
I had brown kids. We I had brown kids. I love my brown kids. 
And I think my brown kids are just as American as everyone else. 
J.D. Vance has brown kids who thinks he he thinks are less American than everyone else." 
Like, "That's wild 
to look at your own kids and be like, 
you don't actually belong as much in 
this country that I brought you into." 
Yeah, that's that's so sad. 
>> [laughter] 
>> I just part of me is like, "Bro, like it 
must have break you every time you like 
hug your own kids." Like, "I'm so sorry." 
Confirmation Bias
13.8%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
27.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
3.3%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
11.5%
Framing Effect
17.5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
5.9%
Negativity Bias
38.7%
Self-Serving Bias
5.2%
Fundamental Attribution Error
17.8%
Actor-Observer Bias
17.5%
In-Group Bias
8.9%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
5.9%
Halo Effect
4.1%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
3%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
4.1%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
4.8%
Red Herring
3.3%
Bandwagon
1.5%
Appeal to Emotion
50.9%
Begging the Question
17.5%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
21.2%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
30.9%
No True Scotsman
4.8%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
11.5%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
26%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

269 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.