New Zealand prime minister on potential of New Zealand-India relationship during Modi visit ⁠96%

7/11/2026, 8:36:32 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 46.7% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 274 faulty-reasoning hits from 184 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 94.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (636 of 14,081 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 95.50% of the video peer group.

It's been a pretty action-packed day. 
We started the day with a formal welcome to Government House of Prime Minister Modi. 
We had our very formal bilaterals, some time one-on-one, but bilateral and also the witnessing of the MOUs that we've signed at a state-to-state level. 
We had a great meeting with business leaders. 
There's an awesome business delegation here and it's a great chance for our business leaders to get familiar with each other and build on the connections that they established in India and talk about the possibilities of what more they could do together. 
Obviously celebration lunch and then a quick showcase of our sports technology given that has been a feature of many of the conversations I've had with Prime Minister Modi given his hosting of the Commonwealth Games and ultimately desired to host the 2036 Olympics. 
So so really fantastic day, but again you come away from it just really excited about the potential that exists in the relationship between these two great countries. >> [applause] 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
30.4%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
46.7%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
16.3%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
28.3%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
3.3%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
23.9%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

184 words analyzed.

Voice attribution · Experimental

Who is speaking?

See where attributed voices appear and how each speaker's manipulation signature differs from the writer's voice.

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.