NTD100%

Cellphone Captures People Running From In N Out Shooting in Idaho 90%

8/1/2026, 9:19:00 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 73.3% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 711 faulty-reasoning hits from 165 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 78.6% and a BS Rank of 90% (2,752 of 25,181 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 89.10% of the video peer group.

[ __ ] are shooting at In and Out. I'm >> like, "Get in that [ __ ] How you going to get out of there? You're [ __ ] backed up in [ __ ] traffic." 
>> People are dead ass shooting at In and Out right now. People are running in their thing. 
>> Look at them. They running. >> They running. 
>> Hey yo, they running. 
still shooting. 
>> Oh, dude. They shooting up. >> Hell yeah. 
>> What the [ __ ] got a AK? >> Oh, hell yeah, he does. 
>> Look at this wacky mother. He got [ __ ] serious gun. >> Oh, now he's getting a mother. Oh, 
he's getting a mother. Oh, >> he grabbing another gun. >> Oh, you grabbing something bigger. >> We're getting the out of here. 
>> You better get out of here. 
Hey, stop chewing. Stop chewing, [ __ ] 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
45.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
9.1%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
25.5%
Framing Effect
6.7%
Loss Aversion
4.2%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
13.9%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
4.2%
Negativity Bias
71.5%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
22.4%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
12.7%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
9.7%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
12.7%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
13.9%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
4.8%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
73.3%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
13.9%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
15.2%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
21.8%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
49.7%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

165 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.