The Impact of Conspiracy Thinking on Well-Being 48%

By Willis Klein BSc.66%

8/1/2026, 9:16:32 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 153 hits. Analysis detected 1,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 688 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (13,273 of 25,265 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the article peer group.

Do you have a friend or loved one who believes in conspiracy theories? 
According to a 2017 study published in the Journal of Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, the chances that you do are quite high. 
The study's authors report that over a quarter of the 5645 American adults surveyed endorsed some form of conspiracy theory. 
Some researchers estimate that as much as one-third of people may endorse some form of conspiracy theory. 
Some conspiracy theories may seem harmless enough at first glance. 
Something is endearing about the kitschy Bigfoot-sighting maps available at gas stations in the Pacific Northwest and images of little green men in flying saucers flying over the Nevada desert. 
Unfortunately, conspiracy theories are not all kitschy fun; they often lead to racist and antisemitic explanations for a wide variety of social problems. 
In a 2026 article published in Applied Cognitive Psychology, psychologist Andrew Denovan and his co-authors explain that a core aspect of conspiracy theories is that they “attribute major events or circumstances to the coordinated, purposeful, and covert actions of powerful actors,” challenging mainstream institutional narratives. 
While the vast majority of these challenges to mainstream narratives are totally false, conspiracy theorists have been proven correct on occasion. 
One example of an event that is now widely accepted as real but was once dismissed as conspiracy is the MKUltra experiments, a Cold War-era program of research that aimed to create super soldiers and mind control techniques. 
The victims of the MKUltra experiments were subjected to psychological torture. 
Similarly, Watergate, the political scandal involving illegal wiretapping of the Democratic National Convention, is now widely accepted as fact, but was once thought of as a conspiracy. 
Conspiracy theorists are often portrayed as isolated loners, with little going for them—like Jesse Plemons’ recent portrayal of Teddy Gatz in the film Bugonia. 
But if as much as a third of people endorse conspiracy theories, your average conspiracy theorist is unlikely to be much like the isolated misanthrope that might come to mind when we imagine them. 
**What impact does endorsing conspiracy theories have on believers? 
** 
Denovan and his team wanted to investigate the relationship between believing in conspiracy theories and self-evaluation, meaning, and life satisfaction. 
They reasoned that conspiracy theorists believe malicious and powerful forces surround them, and they likely have a threat-focused cognitive processing style. 
Threat-focused cognitive processing is associated with reduced self-esteem, meaning, and life satisfaction; the study's authors hypothesized that individuals who endorse conspiracy theories would also be lower on these variables. 
They sampled 615 participants in the United Kingdom, ages 19 to 82, every two months for eight months. 
They found that higher levels of conspiratorial ideation were associated with more pessimism and less self-esteem. 
Pessimism and low self-esteem were associated with less presence of meaning in life; however, conspiratorial ideation was associated with more presence of meaning in life and search for meaning in life. 
The presence of meaning in life was associated with more life satisfaction, whereas lower self-esteem and search for meaning in life were associated with less life satisfaction. 
While the relationship between conspiracy theory and life satisfaction is complicated, overall, the endorsement of conspiracy theory was linked to lower levels of life satisfaction. 
However, the study's authors caution that their study's design cannot show causality. 
Why might someone believe in a conspiracy theory? 
It seems that while conspiracy theories are associated with lower overall life satisfaction, they could also increase a sense of meaning in life in some cases. 
Believing in conspiracy theories may also help provide a sense of community. 
Furthermore, conspiracy theories have occasionally been proven correct. 
The conspiracist may also interpret the negative consequences of their theories as being further evidence for their convictions. 
In the mind of the conspiracy theorists, lower life satisfaction may be a natural consequence of having taken the “red pill” or refused their dose of “Soma.” 
Denovan and his co-authors have a few suggestions for combating conspiracy thinking. 
They suggest that interventions aimed at improving self-esteem and fostering meaning in life may help break the patterns of thinking that lead to such theories. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
6.1%
Availability Heuristic
10%
Representativeness Heuristic
4.9%
Hindsight Bias
3.1%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
5.2%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
14.1%
Self-Serving Bias
2.6%
Fundamental Attribution Error
3.1%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
3.5%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
4.4%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
3.9%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
3.5%
Appeal to Authority
16.6%
False Dilemma
4.9%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
2.6%
Hasty Generalization
22.2%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
10.2%
Begging the Question
3.1%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
9.7%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
4.5%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
3.1%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
6.5%
Quote-first Misdirection
6.5%
Biased Writer Voice
6%
Indoctrination
4.9%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

688 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.