BS Summary: This article contains 2 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 5 hits. Analysis detected 9 faulty-reasoning hits from 145 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 1% (24,971 of 25,181 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the article peer group.

Disgust: The Unexpected Psychological Reason Why Some People Dislike Density 
Displacing Black Time and Space in Philadelphia 
It’s Time for City Planners To Be Proactive About Church Property Transitions 
Our Planning Process is Broken. 
Street Experiments Can Help. 
Planning for Innovative Urban Mobility in Jersey City 
Climate Change  and Transformative Urban Leadership  Set to Shape Atlanta’s Future 
Want to Invigorate Community Engagement? 
Break out the Building Blocks. 
Creating Equitable Infrastructure 
Next City Vanguard Conference Big Idea Exchange 
LEARN-ing to Sustain a City’s Culture and Character 
How a Year-old Virtual University is Changing Design Education 
Solutions of the Year: A Next City Reporters Roundtable 
How Covid-19 Inspired Oakland to Get Real About Equitable Urban Planning 
Students’ Hands-On Experience Creates Sustainable, Equitable Parks 
Maintaining Data on the Curb with CurbLR: A New Open Standard 
Building Capacity Together Through Community Based Learning 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
2.8%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
3.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

145 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.