Raw Story93%

'It's stunning!' CNN's Erin Burnett floored as Trump 'raking it in' with Saudi deal 86%

By Robert Davis75%

7/24/2026, 12:54:41 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 49% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 882 faulty-reasoning hits from 306 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 78.1% and a BS Rank of 86% (3,046 of 20,986 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 85.50% of the article peer group.

'It's stunning!' 
CNN's Erin Burnett floored as Trump 'raking it in' with Saudi deal 
The details of President Donald Trump's nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia caused alarm bells to ring out on CNN on Thursday. 
CNN's Erin Burnett and Rep. 
James Walkinshaw (D-VA) discussed a new report during a segment on "OutFront" that the Trump company has been awarded a $63 billion development opportunity in Saudi Arabia, and that award happened around the same time that the Trump administration was negotiating with the Saudis in a deal that allows the country to enrich nuclear energy for civilian purposes . 
The company that awarded the development agreement is also linked to Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed Bin-Salman, who has also invested in Jared Kushner's $2 billion hedge fund during the first Trump administration. 
It also noted that Trump gets to keep 80% ownership in the development deal himself, while his family gets the remaining 20%. 
Burnett was taken aback by the report. 
" It's stunning," Burnett said about the report. 
"Congressman, the W hite House [told] Forbes there are no conflicts of interest. 
What do you say?" 
Walkinshaw did not mince words in his reaction. 
"Clearly, we have a president of the United States, Donald Trump, who has been bought and paid for by MBS and the Saudi royal family," Walkinshaw said. 
"As the American people struggle to make ends meet, Donald Trump is raking it in. 
And it appears, at least initially, [he's] giving them in return a much sweeter nuclear deal, quite frankly, than was on the table in the Biden administration with much weaker inspections, at least initially without a commitment to join the Abraham Accords. 
The Saudis must have been feeling like they were getting what they paid for." 
Confirmation Bias
41.8%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
6.9%
Representativeness Heuristic
10.8%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
7.8%
Loss Aversion
4.9%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
49%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
10.8%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
8.8%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
13.7%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
4.2%
False Dilemma
13.7%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
13.7%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
28.4%
Begging the Question
8.8%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
19.3%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
4.6%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
10.8%
Unattributed Quote
1.3%
Quote-first Misdirection
5.2%
Biased Writer Voice
23.5%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

306 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.