Raw Story93%

WSJ bashes Trump's latest 'bad idea' in editorial: 'Let's hope the president realizes' 76%

By Matthew Chapman99%

7/14/2026, 12:38:26 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 605 faulty-reasoning hits from 368 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 69.8% and a BS Rank of 76% (3,696 of 15,282 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump needs to admit he was taken for a ride by Iran, the conservative Wall Street Journal editorial board wrote in a Monday evening postmortem of his few-week-long memorandum of understanding that was initially touted as a step toward real peace. 
"Let’s hope the President realizes the memorandum of understanding Iran signed with him was a fraud," wrote the board, which has been skeptical of Trump's deal from the get-go . 
Trump certainly seems to have realized he needs a new approach, the board, wrote, as he is now committing the United States to protect commerce in the Strait of Hormuz  and demanding a 20% toll on cargo going through it. 
"No one knows how serious Mr. 
Trump is about a $15-a-barrel toll on oil exiting the Strait," wrote the board, calling it a "bad idea" but also not a "crazy" impulse for Trump to want to be compensated for being the world's police. 
"Most important is Mr. 
Trump’s commitment to the Strait. 
After ducking the matter in wartime, and then trying to solve it via diplomacy only for Iran to renege, the President now declares U.S. guardianship. 
This was always required to 'finish the job,' as he lately describes his goal." 
A new, tougher stance could turn things around for Trump, the board said, and put real pressure on the regime  but it took the president entirely too long to get to this point. 
"With the MOU Mr. 
Trump gave the regime a reprieve, and as usual it perceived U.S. weakness and sought to exploit it," wrote the board, saying that Iran made a mockery of the deal and it is "in tatters" now. 
"Giving up leverage with the MOU didn’t work, and we hope Mr. 
Trump has also tossed that in the bin of broken Iranian promises. 
If the Iranians want to talk about their nuclear weapons program, let them negotiate under the U.S. blockade as their main revenue source dries up." 
Ultimately, the board concluded, "Last week Mr. 
Trump told the truth about Iran’s lying regime. 
Now let him act on it  and stick to the strategy." 
Confirmation Bias
15.2%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
29.6%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
13.6%
Loss Aversion
6.8%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
9.2%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
13.3%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
2.2%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
9.8%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
11.7%
False Dilemma
6.8%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
19%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
10.3%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
10.1%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
3.5%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
3.3%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

368 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker63%attributed speech138writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
87%flagged-word coverage
230 attributed words100% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
Quote-first Misdirection-9.4 pts
Writer 9.4%Wall Street Journal editorial board 0%
Indoctrination+5.2 pts
Writer 0%Wall Street Journal editorial board 5.2%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.