The Ohio Channel 80%

7/19/2026, 1:38:57 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 71.3% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 376 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 72.2% and a BS Rank of 80% (3,795 of 18,323 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 79.30% of the article peer group.

The Ohio Channel is a service of Ohio's public broadcasting stations. 
A new concept in public affairs programming, the Ohio Channel combines Statehouse coverage with locally produced PBS programs to give a statewide perspective on issues that affect the lives of all Ohioans. 
Coverage of Statehouse activities is unedited and is commentary-free to give you an unbiased and open perspective on government activities. 
The Ohio House of Representatives, the Ohio Senate, and the Supreme Court of Ohio are all covered gavel to gavel. 
In addition, news conferences and meetings are broadcast across the state. 
Visit The Ohio Channel's site for additional live and on-demand video. 
Confirmation Bias
18.5%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
28.7%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
29.6%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
48.1%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
29.6%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
18.5%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
18.5%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
18.5%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
48.1%
Indoctrination
18.5%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
71.3%

108 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.