Apple, Google send new round of cyber threat notifications to users around world85%

By Reuters72%

12/5/2025, 8:43:30 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.8% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 645 faulty-reasoning hits from 299 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 78.5% and a BS Rank of 85% (2,515 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 85.00% of the article peer group.

By Reuters 
December 5, 2025  8:29 AM PST 
REUTERS/Abdul Saboor 
WASHINGTON (Reuters)  Apple (AAPL.O) and Google have sent a new round of cyber threat notifications to users around the world, the companies said this week, announcing their latest effort to insulate customers against surveillance threats. 
Apple and the Alphabet-owned (GOOGL.O) Google are two of several tech companies that regularly issue warnings to users when they determine they may have been targeted by state-backed hackers. 
Apple said the warnings were issued on Dec. 2 but gave few further details about the alleged hacking activity and did not address questions about the number of users targeted or say who was thought to be conducting the surveillance. 
Apple said that "to date we have notified users in over 150 countries in total." 
Apple's statement follows Google's Dec. 3 announcement that it was warning all known users targeted using Intellexa spyware, which it said spanned "several hundred accounts across various countries, including Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Angola, Egypt, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, and Tajikistan." 
Google said in its announcement that Intellexa, a cyber intelligence company that is sanctioned by the U.S. government, was "evading restrictions and thriving." 
Executives tied to Intellexa did not immediately return messages. 
Previous waves of warnings have triggered headlines and prompted investigations by government bodies, including the European Union, whose senior officials have previously been targeted using spyware. 
Threat notifications impose costs on cyber spies by alerting victims, said John Scott-Railton, a researcher with the Canadian digital watchdog group Citizen Lab. 
He said they were "also often the first step in a string of investigations and discoveries that can lead to real accountability around spyware abuses." 
Reporting by Raphael Satter in Washington, Aditya Kalra in New Delhi, and Stephen Nellis in San Francisco; Editing by David Goodman and Philippa Fletcher 
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
5%
Availability Heuristic
21.4%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Confirmation Bias
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Framing Effect
40.8%
Fundamental Attribution Error
3%
Halo Effect
12%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Horn Effect
0%
In-Group Bias
9.7%
Loss Aversion
0%
Negativity Bias
24.1%
Optimism Bias
16.1%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Recency Bias
8.7%
Representativeness Heuristic
21.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Anecdotal
0%
Appeal to Authority
32.4%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Composition/Division
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Hasty Generalization
12.7%
Middle Ground
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Red Herring
0%
Slippery Slope
8.4%
Special Pleading
0%
Straw Man
0%
Tu Quoque
0%

299 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.