Yay books! Soundside's 2025 in letters88%

By Libby Denkmann0% Gabrielle Healy0%

12/18/2025, 11:45:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 60.4% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 509 faulty-reasoning hits from 149 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 81.2% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,130 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 87.30% of the article peer group.

There are only a few weeks left in 2025. 
That means for those of you who resolved, at the beginning of the year, to do more reading  it's crunch time. 
Did you actually put down your phone long enough to get through a book this year? 
It's not too late. 
Many great books came out this year. 
If you need suggestions for something to read or to give to someone who really ought to be reading more, we've got you covered. 
GUESTS: 
Misha Stone, reader services librarian, Seattle Public Library 
Spencer Ruchti, author events manager, Third Place Books 
RELATED LINKS: 
Our list of books we loved! Yes, it's a Google Doc. 
Yes, it's a Google Doc. 
Thank you to the supporters of KUOW, you help make this show possible! 
If you want to help out, go to kuow.org/donate/soundsidenotes 
Soundside is a production of KUOW in Seattle, a proud member of the NPR Network. 
Actor-Observer Bias
10.4%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
4.5%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Confirmation Bias
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Framing Effect
60.4%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Halo Effect
27.3%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Horn Effect
0%
In-Group Bias
40.9%
Loss Aversion
20.1%
Negativity Bias
26%
Optimism Bias
14.3%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Status Quo Bias
3.2%
Sunk Cost Effect
14.3%
Ad Hominem
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Anecdotal
7.1%
Appeal to Authority
35.7%
Appeal to Emotion
29.9%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Begging the Question
26%
Burden of Proof
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Composition/Division
0%
False Dilemma
10.4%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Middle Ground
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Red Herring
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Straw Man
0%
Tu Quoque
0%

154 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.