Producer Picks: Tactile Basketball, Costco, Cougar Gold, and the Grand Illusion Cinema92%

By Sarah Leibovitz0% Libby Denkmann0% Shane Mehling0% Hans Anderson0% Jason Burrows0%

12/25/2025, 6:45:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 56.2% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 394 faulty-reasoning hits from 137 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 87.6% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,389 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 91.70% of the article peer group.

Christmas Eve begins our holiday break here on Soundside. 
We’re taking some time off to enjoy the holidays with our friends and family… or to just eat lots of good food while staying indoors. 
But we’ve still got plenty of jam packed shows ready for you. 
Today - we’re focusing on local businesses here in the Pacific Northwest. 
RELATED LINKS: A tech startup helping the visually impaired "watch" sports with their fingertips 
Will people always love Costco? 
At 75, Cougar Gold canned cheese is still a Washington state favorite 
The lights go down... for now... on the Grand Illusion Cinema 
Thank you to the supporters of KUOW, you help make this show possible! 
If you want to help out, go to kuow.org/donate/soundsidenotes 
Soundside is a production of KUOW in Seattle, a proud member of the NPR Network. 
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
12.4%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Confirmation Bias
3.6%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Framing Effect
15.3%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Halo Effect
21.2%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Horn Effect
0%
In-Group Bias
56.2%
Loss Aversion
8%
Negativity Bias
0%
Optimism Bias
37.2%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
8%
Primacy Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Self-Serving Bias
9.5%
Status Quo Bias
17.5%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
3.6%
Anecdotal
19%
Appeal to Authority
10.9%
Appeal to Emotion
34.3%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Bandwagon
8.8%
Begging the Question
3.6%
Burden of Proof
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Composition/Division
0%
False Dilemma
18.2%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Middle Ground
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Red Herring
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Straw Man
0%
Tu Quoque
0%

137 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.