Jury finds 3 Spokane protesters guilty of conspiracy for blocking transfer of ICE detainees 23%

By Doug Nadvornick0% Eliza Billingham0%

5/29/2026, 11:35:50 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 484 faulty-reasoning hits from 445 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.3% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,984 of 16,813 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the article peer group.

Three Spokane protesters were convicted of federal conspiracy charges Thursday and now await their sentencing. 
The protestors face up to six years in prison and up to $250,000 in fines. 
Jac Archer, Justice Forral and Bajun Mavalwalla II were arrested for trying to prevent federal officers from transporting two detained immigrants from Spokane to Tacoma in June 2025. 
The trio, dubbed the “Spokane 3,” were among hundreds who responded to a Facebook post by former City Council President Ben Stuckart last summer that called for people to join him in blocking the transfer bus. 
Stuckart was a sponsor for one of the two detained immigrants. 
Both were in the United States seeking asylum. 
Nine of the protesters, including Stuckart, were arrested on conspiracy charges. 
Stuckart was among six who took guilty pleas for reduced sentences. 
After a jury handed down the verdict Thursday, Washington State Representative Natasha Hill, D-Spokane, thanked people who supported the defendants through the nearly two-week trial  but called out Stuckart for not showing up. 
“You started this and you couldn’t even show up to finish it,” she said. 
“So I call on you, and I call on others to do what you said you were going to do, and stand up for your community because the fight is not over with this conviction.” 
Stuckart posted on Facebook Thursday night that he was told attending the trial could violate the terms of his parole. 
“I feel awful about the guilty verdict. 
I feel awful for Jac, Bajun and Justice and their families. 
I support those that took plea deals, and I support those that went to trial,” Stuckart wrote. 
Bajun Mavalwalla, Sr., the father of one of the protesters and a congressional candidate, said federal attorneys wanted to make an example of his son. 
He said he believed the federal government is trying to deter people around the country from speaking out against immigration enforcement policy. 
“The right to protest, the right to dissent, the right to assemble—all of those things are now in question because of this case,” he said. 
"In other cases across the country, the juries were not tainted and the cases have been thrown out.” 
Mavalwalla, Sr., said he hopes that will happen in this case as well. 
The Spokesman Review reported that in her closing statement, U.S. 
Attorney Lisa Cartier-Giroux said that the protesters had planned to block federal agents from leaving and that agents felt afraid as the protest grew in size. 
Defense attorneys said they expect to appeal the conviction. 
The Northwest News Network’s Adia White contributed to this report. 
Confirmation Bias
4.9%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
4%
Representativeness Heuristic
4%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
2.9%
Pessimism Bias
5.6%
Negativity Bias
17.5%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
5.6%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
5.6%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
9.7%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
20.9%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
4.9%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
4%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
3.1%
Quote-first Misdirection
7.9%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
7.9%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

445 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.