OutKick96%

Pitino Magic Returns: St. John’s Buzzer-Beater Sends Red Storm Back To Sweet Sixteen For First Time Since 1999 52%

By Trey Wallace0%

3/23/2026, 12:45:14 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.1% saturation with 248 hits. Analysis detected 685 faulty-reasoning hits from 603 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (8,102 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the article peer group.

What more could you have wanted from a Rick Pitino versus Bill Self showdown for a spot in the Sweet Sixteen? 
How about a buzzer-beater from St. 
John's to hold off a fierce rally from Kansas? 
It's been eleven years since Rick Pitino could consider himself sweet enough in the NCAA Tournament for a championship run, and for the first time since 1999, the Red Storm are headed back to the Sweet Sixteen. 
So you thought the ending of Nebraska versus Vanderbilt was crazy? 
What we witnessed in San Diego was essentially the Basketball Gods telling us to hold their beer. 
NCAA’s March Madness Rules Are Limiting Team Social Media Content, And Schools Are Pushing Back Now 
Just as everything looked as if it was going wrong for St. 
John's, with Kansas going on an incredible 29-3 run up until the final possession, the Red Storm found itself with the ball as the clock sat at 2.9 seconds remaining in the game. 
There were no more fouls to give for Kansas, and Bill Self had to come up with something defensively to hold off a prayer by St. 
John's. 
Dylan Darling had not scored a single point up until the final possession of the game, but the Johnnies guard saved his best play for last. 
Rick Pitino had his St. 
John's team clear out the paint, where Darling came streaking through to hit the game-winning contested layup that sent his school back to the third round for the first time in over 25 years. 
Asked what his head coach was telling him in the final huddle before the game-winner, Darling proclaimed that it didn't have much to do about the upcoming play. 
"He was yelling at me, per usual," Darling jokingly recalled following his game-winning shot. 
Darling is also the first player in NCAA Tournament history to score his first points of a game on a last-second shot. 
Yep, that sounds about right for the St. 
John's coach who has revived a basketball program that had essentially been left for dead over the past two decades. 
First Sweet Sixteen Since 1999 For St. 
John's, Monster Showdown Awaits 
Who will be awaiting this St. 
John's squad in the Sweet Sixteen? 
That would be the No. 1 seeded Duke Blue Devils, in Washington D.C. on Thursday night. 
What more could you ask for from the NCAA Tournament? 
Two programs led by hall-of-fame coaches searching for their next title. 
For Rick Pitino and Bill Self, this was only the second time in their careers that they had coached against each other, and my goodness this one will be remembered. 
Now, the St. 
John's head coach is hunting for his second national championship, since his 2013 title was forced to be vacated at Louisville following NCAA recruiting violations. 
His last title that is recognized came in 1996 as head coach of the Kentucky Wildcats. 
For everything that the NCAA Tournament provides us on a yearly basis, seeing Pitino coaching for another national championship is a spectacle, and this year will be no different. 
No stranger to the Final Four, thanks to multiple trips with Providence, Kentucky, Louisville and Iona, a return trip for Rick Pitino will take a massive effort from his St. 
John's team against Duke. 
But, as we've come to realize with the "Godfather" of college basketball, never doubt Pitino with a talented squad. 
This showdown with Duke has the potential to steal the show, just as his St. 
John's team did against Kansas on Sunday night. 
Confirmation Bias
1.3%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
4.3%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
4.8%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
7.1%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
2.5%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
8.1%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
3.2%
Red Herring
2.7%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
33%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
2.3%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
41.1%
Indoctrination
3.2%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

603 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.