KUER0%

With a taste of the playoffs, Utah Mammoth fans are now all-in on their team 73%

By Devyn Latorre0%

4/28/2026, 6:44:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 1,102 faulty-reasoning hits from 641 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 65.5% and a BS Rank of 73% (4,669 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the article peer group.

It was a sold-out crowd for the Utah Mammoth's first-ever home Stanley Cup Playoff game against the Vegas Golden Knights. 
But not every hockey enthusiast was at the Delta Center for that historic opener. 
Just a 40-minute drive away, Boneyard Saloon in Park City was filled with fans clad in black, blue and white, ready to bring 'Tusks Up' energy into a highly anticipated game. 
As soon as the first puck dropped, all eyes were glued to the TV. 
"They love it," said Boneyard Manager Regina Lucero. 
She said many of the fans who attended the bar's first official watch party at the start of the playoff series showed up to watch the first home playoff game as well. 
"They love the food, the atmosphere, it's amazing." 
For the first 12 minutes, the pressure in the bar mirrored the high-stakes energy of a Game 7. 
There wasn't a phone in sight  all the attention was on the game. 
Even the food on the tables seemed like an afterthought. 
Everyone held their breath to see who would score first, in hopes that the Mammoth would come out on top. 
And then it happened. 
Utah defenseman MacKenzie Weegar ripped a slapshot that bounced off the goalie and into the back of the net. 
The bar erupted in cheers, and groups high-fived each other as if they were at the Delta Center themselves, sporting big, relieved smiles. 
At the end of the first period, the Mammoth had taken a 2-0 lead, which brought the energy back to equilibrium. 
People remembered their phones and resumed their conversations. 
In the second period, Utah was up by four, and by then, many fans had paid their tab and trickled out. 
But a few stayed until the end, including Park City locals Debbie and Kurt Hultberg. 
The couple showed up repping their Mammoth gear, but their love of watching the NHL is rooted in the Midwest. 
They both grew up in Chicago, and Debbie said that in her twenties, she worked for a company that had season tickets for employees, so they attended "many games." 
"We were Blackhawks fans," Kurt said, explaining that they kept rooting for that team even once they moved out West. 
But once the Mammoth came to Utah, everything changed. 
"There's a lot of fans from other teams, but now we're starting to shift over," he said. 
"People are converting to be Mammoth fans." 
Now, the Hultbergs are Mammoth season-ticket holders, and even went to see the team in Las Vegas for the first two games of the series. 
For seven years, Vegas had the closest NHL franchise to Salt Lake City, growing a solid fanbase for the Golden Knights in the Beehive State. 
But after Utah established its NHL franchise in 2024, fans began trading in their gold for blue. 
Before the first home playoff game, Mammoth owners Ryan and Ashley Smith offered a one-time deal where fans could bring their Vegas jerseys to the Delta Center in exchange for a new Utah Mammoth home jersey, which can cost up to $250. 
Nearly 1,000 people showed up. 
"Everybody within Utah is really, you know, everyone's really behind the team," Kurt Hultberg said. 
"We're definitely looking forward to the future." 
Lucero, Boneyard's manager, said hockey has brought the community together. 
"Hockey has been one of the things that a lot of people love, and just for us to have something that's our own, I feel like it, it really makes people, like, happier, and kind of, you know, just want to be a part of it," she said. 
And with the best-of-seven series tied 2-2, there's even more ahead. 
Game 5 on April 29 is back in Las Vegas, where the puck will drop at 8 p.m. 
MT. 
Confirmation Bias
9.8%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
13.4%
Representativeness Heuristic
7.6%
Hindsight Bias
3.3%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
8.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
5.8%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
2.8%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
3.7%
Self-Serving Bias
3.9%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
21.2%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
9.5%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
1.7%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
10.8%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
1.1%
Appeal to Emotion
7.5%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
22%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
3.1%
Anecdotal
19.7%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
7%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
1.2%
Quote-first Misdirection
1.2%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
6.6%

641 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.