OutKick96%

NBA Tanking Hits Pathetic New Level With Record-Setting Blowouts 93%

By Ian Miller0%

4/5/2026, 1:00:18 AM

Topics: Nba, Clay Travis, Espn, Bkt
Keywords: Nba, Clay Travis, Espn, Bkt

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 69.7% saturation with 381 hits. Analysis detected 2,098 faulty-reasoning hits from 547 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 89.1% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,211 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 92.80% of the article peer group.

The NBA is not in a good place. 
Well, that's an understatement. 
It's in a very, very bad place. 
Many of the problems bubbling under the surface of the modern NBA seem to be coming to a head in the 2025-2026 season, culminating in the historically embarrassing product now being put out night after night. 
Despite just 82 total games in a season spread out over 165-176 days, many star players can't be bothered to play in all of them. 
Load management has become a dreaded tradition, to the point where the league has repeatedly tried to cut down on rest days. 
To avoid more embarrassment from the lax enforcement of the traveling rule, the NBA then added "gathering" to allow for a seemingly ever-increasing number of steps. 
Then there's the fact that, for some inexplicable reason, the NBA decided it was a good idea to alienate half the country with overt left-wing politics. 
It didn't work. 
RELATED: Here's The Latest Example Of Why The NBA Has Become A Joke 
Then there's the other big problem. 
Tanking. 
Tanking and lack of effort is an inescapable part of the modern game, and people are noticing. 
Tim Reynolds on X posted this jaw-dropping stat on Saturday morning: "There have been two days in NBA history, spanning 80 years, where at least nine games were played with an average margin of victory being at least 24 points. 
Only two such days. 
In 80 Years. 
One was (Friday), the other was Sunday." 
And as Clay Travis pointed out in response, this is why the NBA's new television deals are going to be a disaster for broadcasters. 
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver. 
(Mick Akers/Las Vegas Review-Journal/Tribune News Service via Getty Images) 
NBA Is Going To Keep Shrinking And Costing More Money 
Travis posted on X in response to these stats that there will be "studies written on the billions of dollars US media companies will use on the NBA TV contract." 
He then compared it to the "Titanic of sports media rights deals." 
Not only because the NBA is declining in popularity as right-wing fans have fled, the product disintegrates, and bankable stars age out with few big name replacements, but because other leagues are going to want similar numbers. 
Particularly, the most aggressive and ruthless league in the US sports landscape, the NFL. 
It's really a remarkable combination of factors. 
ESPN, for some reason, decided to invest billions in the NBA. 
Whether due to political alignment, or a misplaced view of the value of the league's rights, or some other unknown factor, they gave Adam Silver $76 billion over 11 years for roughly 80 games per year, the NBA Finals, and several other events. 
Meanwhile, several World Baseball Classic games got similar or better ratings than last year's NBA Finals. 
And in doing so, they opened themselves up to the NFL coming back demanding more money. 
So they're going to increase their cost to broadcast the most important league in the market, all because they spent a fortune on the least important. 
Meanwhile, the league is repaying them by having non-competitive games featuring disinterested players putting in as little effort as possible, if they can even be bothered to play at all. 
Brilliant. 
Confirmation Bias
26.9%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
13.2%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
6.6%
Overconfidence Bias
6.8%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
18.3%
Negativity Bias
58.9%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.1%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
7.3%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
1.1%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
5.5%
False Dilemma
11.3%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
27.8%
Red Herring
0.2%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
8.8%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
30.9%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
12.8%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
21.4%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
4.8%
Unattributed Quote
12.8%
Quote-first Misdirection
7.3%
Biased Writer Voice
69.7%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
11.5%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
7.9%

547 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.