STLPR0%

Why a bill to move St. Charles County school board races from April to November barely passed 12%

By Jason Rosenbaum0%

6/1/2026, 3:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Begging the Question as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 372 faulty-reasoning hits from 467 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28.4% and a BS Rank of 12% (19,417 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the article peer group.

St. 
Charles County voters could decide on school-related issues in November instead of April. 
Near the end of the 2026 legislative session, the Missouri House narrowly passed legislation that moves elections for school boards, bond issues and tax increases from April to November of even-numbered years. 
It now awaits Gov. 
Mike Kehoe’s signature. 
The bill increases the terms for St. 
Charles County school board members from three years to four years. 
It also allows candidates to place political affiliation next to their name, though that wouldn’t be mandatory. 
During an episode of "The Politically Speaking Hour on St. 
Louis on the Air,” state Rep. 
Richard West, R-Wentzville, said the bill could bolster participation in important education-related races. 
He noted that people often don’t turn out to vote in April elections. 
“I'm a huge transparency person,” West said. 
“I believe more voter turnout is better if we're going to raise our taxes and elect people in our school boards, which are very important things.” 
The bill only affects races in St. 
Charles County. 
West said he wanted it to apply to all counties, but ran into opposition in the Missouri Senate. 
“The majority of my county, not to mention my district, supports this,” West said. 
The bill only passed by one vote in the House amid criticism that, among other things, school-related contests in November could get lost among high-profile statewide issues and state legislative races. 
West said that the close vote on the bill shows not all Republicans are in lockstep when it comes to education policy. 
“Maybe their superintendent came to them and said: ‘Look, we're a big supporter of everything that goes on in this county or schools. 
We would recommend that you not vote for it,’” West said. 
“And if that's your district and you feel you don't need to vote for it, then so be it.” 
The legislation also passed after self-described conservative school board candidates lost April elections, including in the Francis Howell School District. 
But West noted he’s been pushing this idea for five years  including during a time when people aligned with his political philosophy were winning seats on school boards. 
“This wasn't as a result of anybody losing any school board race,” West said. 
“If I have 40% of the people turn out, and no matter who gets elected, I just think that's better for the people of St. 
Charles County.” 
“St. 
Louis on the Air” brings you the stories of St. 
Louis and the people who live, work and create in our region. 
The show is produced by Miya Norfleet, Emily Woodbury, Danny Wicentowski, Elaine Cha and Alex Heuer. 
Layla Halilbasicis our production assistant. 
The audio engineer is Aaron Doerr. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
2.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
4.7%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
5.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
8.1%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
6.6%
Self-Serving Bias
6.2%
Fundamental Attribution Error
4.1%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
3%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
1.5%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
5.4%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
7.5%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
4.1%
Begging the Question
8.6%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
4.3%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
7.3%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
0%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

467 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.