How Multilevel Marketing Shaped America 30%

6/10/2026, 8:19:54 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 208 faulty-reasoning hits from 159 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (15,312 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the article peer group.

Multilevel marketing as we know it dates back to the 1940s, with a vitamin company called Nutrilite. 
If you worked for Nutrilite, you didn’t just sell vitamins  you were supposed to recruit other salespeople to buy your supply of vitamins and sell it for you. 
They, in turn, could do the same. 
The pyramid scheme was born. 
Since then, this tactic has made a very small number of people extremely rich and made a far, far larger amount of people hemorrhage money. 
Why do people keep falling for it? 
Journalist Bridget Read says it has something to do with the very American idea of being your own boss. 
She’s joining us to talk about how pyramid schemes defined the nation. 
[Rebroadcast, 6/11/26] 
GUEST  
Bridget Read | Features writer for New York Magazine. 
Her new book is called “Little Bosses Everywhere: How the Pyramid Scheme Shaped America.” 
[Amazon|Bookshop] 
Original Airdate: July 30, 2025 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
11.9%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
15.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
15.7%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
3.1%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
11.9%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
29.6%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
15.7%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
3.1%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
15.1%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
9.4%

159 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.