MS NOW95%
Trump’s EPA takes new steps to help polluters, reversing Biden policies89%
By Steve Benen98%
11/26/2025, 8:19:58 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 38.7% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 1,044 faulty-reasoning hits from 377 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 82.2% and a BS Rank of 89% (2,003 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 88.10% of the article peer group.
It was just last year when the Biden-era Environmental Protection Agency approved a new policy restricting fine-particle pollution as part of an effort to promote cleaner air and prevent thousands of premature deaths.
For environmentalists and public health advocates, it was a breakthrough moment.
It did not last long, however.
A year later, Trump's EPA is predictably moving in the opposite direction.
The Washington Post reported:
On Monday night, the agency moved to vacate defense of the rule, which the Biden administration finalized last year, arguing that the previous administration did not have the authority to tighten it.
That regulation imposed stricter standards on fine particulate matter measuring less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter, including soot, which ranks as the nation's deadliest air pollutant.
Hayden Hashimoto, an attorney at the nonprofit Clean Air Task Force, told the Associated Press, "EPA's motion is a blatant attempt to avoid legal requirements for a rollback, in this case for one of the most impactful actions the agency has taken in recent years to protect public health."
The developments come months after the EPA, currently led by Republican former Rep. Lee Zeldin, cleared the path for increased hazardous emissions from power plants, including mercury, arsenic and lead.
In recent years, when Donald Trump has been pressed on the climate crisis, he's responded that he supports "crystal clean air."
The obvious problem with the response is that it reflects the president's apparent cluelessness about the difference between global warming and air pollution.
The less obvious problem is that under his leadership, air quality in the U.S. has gotten worse, not better.
Now the latest developments add insult to injury, effectively making this a pro-pollution administration.
The policies are tough to defend on their merits, but let's also not forget that the Republican administration is ostensibly committed to a "Make America Healthy Again" agenda.
How does increased support for fine-particle pollution help advance the MAHA cause?
It doesn't.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who rose to public prominence decades ago by suing polluters, has argued that one of the keys to improved public health is reducing environmental toxins.
And yet, there's been nary a word from Kennedy as the administration he works in scrambles to move federal policy in the opposite direction.
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.