MS NOW95%

National Guard shooting becomes the latest failed leadership test for Trump93%

By Steve Benen98%

12/1/2025, 7:35:26 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 70.3% saturation with 272 hits. Analysis detected 1,292 faulty-reasoning hits from 387 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 88.1% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,327 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 92.10% of the article peer group.

The president could have emphasized national unity in the wake of the deadly violence. 
He did the opposite  again. 
The New York Times' David French noted earlier this year that Donald Trump "is at his absolute worst in a crisis." 
The columnist, whose observation was related to foreign policy, added in reference to the president: "He is not a man who is ready to meet important and dangerous moments." 
The assessment came to mind after the Republican president seized on the shooting of two National Guard members in Washington last week. 
The Washington Post's Karen Tumulty explained in an analysis: 
There was a time, not that far in the past, when a shocking tragedy would bring the country together. 
Americans had the capacity to grieve as one  as they did, for instance, in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. 
This reflected their sense of a common purpose and shared values, whatever their political differences might be. 
So far, almost the opposite is happening after two young National Guard members from West Virginia were ambushed, killing one and leaving the other in critical condition. 
It's not that Trump failed in his efforts to bring people together in the wake of tragic violence; rather, the president didn't even try. 
By all appearances, it didn't even occur to him to try. 
Immediately after the attack, which claimed the life of U.S. Army Spc. Sarah Beckstrom, the president did what many expected him to do: He blamed Joe Biden while lashing out at immigrants, refugees and asylum-seekers. 
This keeps happening. 
When there was a deadly hurricane in North Carolina, he flunked a leadership test. 
When there was a deadly attack in New Orleans, he flunked again. 
When responding to deadly fires in California, he flunked again. 
In the wake of the Flight 5342 crash over the Potomac River, he flunked again. 
In the wake of politically motivated violence in Minnesota in June, he flunked again. 
In the wake of the shooting that killed conservative activist Charlie Kirk, he flunked again. 
What Americans keep confronting is a core truth about who the incumbent president is and how he approaches his responsibilities: Trump sees crises as opportunities to air grievances and divide the country. 
To expect him to change is folly. 
This post updates our related earlier coverage. 
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
11.9%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Confirmation Bias
51.4%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Framing Effect
46%
Fundamental Attribution Error
26.6%
Halo Effect
0%
Hindsight Bias
15.5%
Horn Effect
12.9%
In-Group Bias
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Negativity Bias
70.3%
Optimism Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
26.6%
Pessimism Bias
1.8%
Primacy Effect
0%
Recency Bias
2.3%
Representativeness Heuristic
6.2%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Anecdotal
6.2%
Appeal to Authority
7.8%
Appeal to Emotion
4.9%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Begging the Question
8.3%
Burden of Proof
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Composition/Division
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Hasty Generalization
26.1%
Middle Ground
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Personal Incredulity
9%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Red Herring
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Straw Man
0%
Tu Quoque
0%

387 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.