MS NOW95%

Job growth improved in March, following a sharp decline in February 72%

By Steve Benen98%

4/3/2026, 12:52:21 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Recency Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 873 faulty-reasoning hits from 338 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 65.2% and a BS Rank of 72% (4,730 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the article peer group.

Expectations heading into this week showed projections of about 59,000 new jobs being created in the United States in March. 
As it turns out, according to the new report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the totals exceeded those expectations. 
CNBC reported: 
Nonfarm payrolls rose a seasonally adjusted 178,000 during the month, a reversal from the 133,000 decline in February and better than the Dow Jones consensus estimate for 59,000, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday. 
February’s number was revised down by 41,000 while January was revised up by 34,000 to 160,000, putting the three-month average around 68,000. 
With job creation higher, the unemployment rate edged lower to 4.3%. 
It’s worth emphasizing for context that a major nursing strike in California and Hawaii depressed payrolls in February by tens of thousands of jobs, and now that those labor disputes have been resolved, those now count as new jobs in March. 
Still, 178,000 is a good overall number. 
Indeed, though the data will be revised in the coming months, the preliminary totals suggest that March showed the best job growth of Trump’s second term, though the 178,000 jobs falls short of the 237,000 jobs created in December 2024  the last full month of Joe Biden’s term. 
All told, the U.S. economy has added 321,000 jobs over Donald Trump’s 15-month second term. 
Over the previous 15 months, the economy added roughly 1.9 million jobs. 
While March’s totals are certainly a step in the right direction, the overall picture still reflects a stunning reversal, which the Republican administration has made no credible effort to explain or justify. 
To contextualize the data, I put together this chart to show month-to-month totals since the 2020 election. 
The blue columns point to Biden’s presidency, while the red columns point to Trump’s. 
It remains to be seen whether the president responds to the trend by firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (again). 
This post updates our related earlier coverage. 
Confirmation Bias
5.9%
Anchoring Bias
10.4%
Availability Heuristic
11.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
21.3%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
10.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
2.1%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
11.5%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
9.5%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
24.6%
Primacy Effect
5%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
9.5%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
16.3%
False Dilemma
6.8%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
11.5%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
3.3%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
13.9%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
3.6%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
26.6%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
2.1%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
27.8%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
9.5%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
14.5%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

338 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.