Next City89%

Stories tagged ‘Public Space’ 9%

7/31/2026, 6:11:13 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, False Dilemma, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 218 faulty-reasoning hits from 165 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 24.1% and a BS Rank of 9% (20,866 of 22,830 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.40% of the article peer group.

The Three Pillars of Civil Resistance: Lessons From the Twin Cities 
Designing Cities for Grief and Remembrance 
Urban Seating Isn’t Designed for My Body. 
It’s Time To Change That. 
An Early Literacy Initiative Brings Reading to North Philly Playgrounds 
Helsinki Built A Library That Brings A Whole City Together 
Public Spaces and Technology 
Living With the Virus Means Designing Innovative Public Spaces of the Future 
Richmond Muralist Wants People to ‘Find Themselves’ in Her Work 
Will Monuments Honoring People of Color Replace Old Statues of Confederate Generals? 
‘Who’s Benefiting?’ 
As Chinatown Gentrifies, Rail Park Begins Equitable Development Plan 
Armed With More Resources, American Cities Seek to Create an Equitable Post-Pandemic Future 
The Future of Monumentality: A Next City Ebook 
Place Driving Equity: Investing in Public Space for Shared Prosperity 
While We’re Considering Removing Highways, Let’s Not Overlook Pavement 
Why One NYC Mayoral Candidate Wants New York to Look More Like Barcelona 
Community-Responsive Public Spaces Were More Resilient During COVID, Report Finds 
Confirmation Bias
7.3%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
12.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
10.9%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
5.5%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
15.2%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
17%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
6.1%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
6.1%
False Dilemma
12.7%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
6.1%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
1.2%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
5.5%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
6.1%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
7.3%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
4.2%
Indoctrination
9.1%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

165 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.