Los Angeles Times Custom Article Print Plaques79%

11/12/2019, 9:35:06 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 50.6% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 218 faulty-reasoning hits from 160 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 71.7% and a BS Rank of 79% (3,570 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the article peer group.

Commemorate a special day from your own personal history by ordering a Los Angeles Times custom article plaque that you can display in your home or office. 
These pages display your requested articles with the newspaper's masthead and personalized plate. 
- Available in Black Acrylic, Clear Acrylic or Wood 
- Personalized Plate 
- Sizes from 9" x 12" to 30" x 40" (depending on length of article and photos); 3/4" thick (Wood) or 1/4" thick (Clear Acrylic, Black Acrylic) 
- Ready to hang; Acrylic options come with free standing mount option for shelf placement 
PLEASE NOTE: 
- These pages are for personal use only. 
- We offer a 30-day money back guarantee if item is defective. 
- Custom article plaques are only available for articles written by journalists from the Los Angeles Times. 
- Older articles from our archives may be retrieved from microfilm and may appear darker and/or have slight imperfections that show the vintage quality of the article. 
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Confirmation Bias
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Framing Effect
50.6%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Halo Effect
16.9%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Horn Effect
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Loss Aversion
7.5%
Negativity Bias
0%
Optimism Bias
16.9%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Anecdotal
0%
Appeal to Authority
10.6%
Appeal to Emotion
33.8%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Composition/Division
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Middle Ground
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Red Herring
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Straw Man
0%
Tu Quoque
0%

160 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.