Trump’s Own Election Fraud Guy Admits He’s Found No Proof 84%

By Malcolm Ferguson74%

7/17/2026, 12:57:35 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 51.7% saturation with 165 hits. Analysis detected 1,479 faulty-reasoning hits from 319 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 76.6% and a BS Rank of 84% (3,024 of 18,395 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 83.60% of the article peer group.

Not even President Trump’s own election fraud guy could back up his claims that votes in the last three general and midterm elections were tampered with in any way. 
“Can you acknowledge that there were no votes changed in 2020?” 
MS NOW’s Vaughn Hill asked John Solomon, an election interference conspiracy theorist who now sits on the White House’s election task force, after Trump’s speech Thursday night. 
“All I can acknowledge is what the intelligence shows. 
I only know—the intelligence community has zero evidence that  a foreign power flipped the vote in 2020, ’22, or ’24,” Solomon replied . 
“And you’re able to acknowledge that Venezuela has not tampered with voting machines in the United States?” 
“No, the intelligence is very clear: They did it on their own machines,” Solomon said before fleeing the scene. 
Trump used his prime-time speech to accuse China of “illicit acquisition of 220 million U.S. voter files.” 
He said that there was a “specific plot to do a big number in favor of the corrupt Maduro regime in Venezuela,” and that no vote would be safe and sound unless his restrictive SAVE America Act was passed. 
And yet Solomon, a MAGA journalist who has made a career out of manufacturing consent for Trump’s claims, couldn’t even back this one up a little bit. 
NEW: John Solomon acknowledges no votes were changed in the 2020, 2022 or 2024 elections. 
He also, when asked if the 2020 results showing Biden won the presidential election are accurate, said, “I'm researching.” 
And says no intell that Venezuela tempered with US voting machines. pic.twitter.com/nllLSKgPl7 
 Vaughn Hillyard (@VaughnHillyard) July 17, 2026 
That’s probably because Trump’s own intel doesn’t back it up. 
Alongside his speech, Trump declassified documents that confirmed Russia interfered in his favor by pushing claims about Hunter Biden and conspiracies about the reliability of mail-in voting. 
Confirmation Bias
29.8%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
16.3%
Framing Effect
39.5%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
3.1%
Negativity Bias
51.7%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.2%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
8.5%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
8.5%
Halo Effect
8.5%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
4.7%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
26%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
24.8%
False Dilemma
8.8%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
4.7%
Red Herring
5.3%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
15.4%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
3.1%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
26.6%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
3.8%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
34.5%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
6%
Genetic Fallacy
8.5%
Unattributed Quote
16.3%
Quote-first Misdirection
11.3%
Biased Writer Voice
42.9%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
30.7%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
12.2%

319 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.