Fox News89%

Tim Walz offers strange defense for pardoning convicted child rapist Trump admin deported 5%

7/16/2026, 1:03:14 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 320 faulty-reasoning hits from 516 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 20.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (15,465 of 16,253 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.20% of the article peer group.

Minnesota Gov. 
Tim Walz publicly defended his vote to pardon a Laotian national who had been under a final removal order after losing legal status following a child-sex-crime conviction convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct involving a 10-year-old girl after the Trump administration deported him to Laos last week. 
Tou Lue Vang, 42, received a pardon from Minnesota's Board of Pardons on June 10. 
Last Friday, the Trump administration announced that Vang's legal status had been revoked and that he had been deported to his home country of Laos. 
Asked about the deportation, Walz questioned what the move accomplished. 
"Did that make us any safer?" 
Walz said Tuesday, according to KTTC. 
"Did that make the children that are left behind any more stable?" 
"Did it improve the idea that we can’t all be judged by our worst day?" 
he added. 
"And I want to be very clear," Walz continued. 
"These are horrific crimes. 
They often are." 
Walz also said Vang's pardon was not about immigration policy , noting that the Board of Pardons had denied clemency to other applicants facing immigration-related consequences. 
Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Vang's deportation Friday, telling Fox News Digital: "Americans should never have to live in fear that foreign sex predators  shielded from deportation by their own elected officials  could endanger them or their children." 
"That's why I terminated his legal status in the United States," Rubio continued. 
"Vang has now been removed from our country and will never pose a threat to any American ever again." 
Fox News Digital previously reported that Vang admitted to repeatedly sexually assaulting a girl over a period of several years beginning when she was 10 years old. 
Vang entered the United States through California in 1994 and was granted legal status during the Clinton administration. 
Between 2002 and 2004, he repeatedly sexually assaulted the victim in St. 
Paul, Minnesota . 
The first assault occurred when she was in the fourth grade. 
After his conviction, federal officials said Vang lost legal status and was placed under a final removal order. 
The Minnesota Clemency Review Commission recommended a pardon for Vang. 
The Board of Pardons  made up of Walz, Attorney General Keith Ellison and Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Natalie Hudson  later granted the pardon. 
The pardon drew criticism from federal immigration officials and Republican lawmakers. 
Walz defended the decision by citing the victim’s support for Vang’s pardon, among other factors, according to KSTP. 
A spokesperson for Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison’s office told MPR News that the pardon did not protect Vang from deportation. 
At the time, Homeland Security Acting Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis criticized the decision. 
"Governor Tim Walz's decision to pardon an illegal alien convicted child rapist so he can remain in our country is disgusting," Bis said. 
"These are the criminal illegal aliens he and his Minnesota sanctuary politicians are protecting," she added. 
Fox News Digital has reached out to Walz's office for additional comment. 
Fox News Digital's Peter Pinedo contributed to this report. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
3.7%
Framing Effect
0%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
23.4%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
3.1%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
3.1%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
2.5%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
4.5%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
6.8%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
12.4%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
2.5%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

516 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.