Fox News88%

Taxpayer spending on 'exorcisms' derails Senate testimony: 'What the hell are we doing about it?' 47%

By Elaine Mallon0%

5/21/2026, 10:00:18 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 32.3% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 1,618 faulty-reasoning hits from 468 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (8,940 of 16,813 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the article peer group.

Sen. 
John Kennedy, R-La., railed against California’s Medicaid program, Medi-Cal, which is facing scrutiny from the Trump administration over fraud allegations, as Kennedy highlighted reports during a Tuesday hearing that the state covers exorcisms and other faith-based healing practices. 
Medi-Cal’s spending practices have faced growing scrutiny as California’s Medicaid spending has more than doubled since 2019, rising from roughly $100.7 billion to a projected $222 billion in 2026. 
Just last week, the Trump administration suspended $1.4 billion in federal funding for California home health and hospice programs after Vice President J.D. 
Vance’s anti-fraud task force identified an estimated $600 million in suspected fraud within the state's Medicaid system. 
Kennedy alleged during his line of questioning to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche that taxpayer dollars were being used to cover the cost of exorcisms, a religious practice most commonly associated with the Catholic Church, and other indigenous spiritual practices. 
LAWMAKERS IN DEEP BLUE STATE DEMAND AUDIT OVER SKYROCKETING HEALTHCARE COSTS: 'ALARMING NATURE' 
"California's got 12% of the population in the last ten years," Kennedy told Blanche. 
"They're responsible for half of these new so-called health providers to provide exorcisms and other things. 
Now, what the hell are we doing about it? 
Why has this gone on for so long?" 
Reports that California provides Medicaid coverage for exorcisms and other spiritual rituals were first reported by The Wall Street Journal. 
In 2024, Medi-Cal expanded coverage for recipients seeking traditional healers and natural helpers within tribal communities. 
Services covered by taxpayer dollars include music therapy and spiritual interventions such as ceremonies, rituals and herbal remedies, according to a press release from Gov. 
Gavin Newsom's office. 
To be recognized by the state as a traditional healer, a person must have served as a spiritual leader within an American Indian tribe for at least two years and be contracted by an Indian Health Care Provider. 
Meanwhile, the requirement for a natural helper is less stringent and can apply to anyone considered a "trusted" member of an American Indian tribe. 
Newsom said this expansion of coverage for tribal medicine was made to assist in "helping heal the historical wounds inflicted on tribes." 
"Like many of the issues that plague successive generations of Native people, those inequities can be traced back to the historical atrocities the U.S. inflicted on tribes across the country," Newsom said in a press release announcing the Medi-Cal expansion. 
"By supporting greater access to traditional medicine and healing, we are taking another step toward a healthier, brighter future." 
It remains unclear how much Medi-Cal has spent covering services provided by traditional healers or natural helpers. 
The California Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to Fox News Digital's questions by the time of publication. 
Confirmation Bias
20.1%
Anchoring Bias
3%
Availability Heuristic
14.3%
Representativeness Heuristic
6.2%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
28%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
12.2%
Pessimism Bias
1.7%
Negativity Bias
31%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
8.5%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
4.9%
Primacy Effect
7.5%
Blind-Spot Bias
3.6%
Ad Hominem
4.5%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
12.4%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
16.2%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
2.8%
Appeal to Emotion
32.3%
Begging the Question
9.4%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
19.7%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
14.1%
Appeal to Nature
8.5%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
29.5%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
22.4%
Quote-first Misdirection
6%
Biased Writer Voice
14.1%
Indoctrination
4.7%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
8.1%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

468 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.