KUER0%

Water rights paperwork tied to Box Elder data center withdrawn after heavy protest 54%

By Macy Lipkin0%

5/7/2026, 5:34:37 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.9% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 733 faulty-reasoning hits from 321 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.5% and a BS Rank of 54% (7,755 of 16,813 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the article peer group.

After more than 3,700 protests were filed against a northern Utah water rights change tied to a proposed massive data center in Box Elder County, the owner, Bar H Ranch, has withdrawn the application with the Utah Division of Water Rights. 
But the project is not abandoning this water, which accounts for a chunk of the water rights the developers plan to get. 
“Bar H. 
Ranch intends to resubmit in a timely manner with additional supporting information and to further demonstrate the feasibility of the application,” a consultant wrote in an email to the division. 
“The applicant fully intends to move forward with the project and remain committed to working collaboratively through the process,” the consultant said. 
The change application sought to repurpose the water from agricultural use to industrial use for the natural-gas-fueled power plant intended for the Stratos Project data center complex. 
The application noted that a small portion of the water would be used for the cooling system. 
Each protest costs $15 to file, and a division spokesperson said protesters will not get their money back. 
Deeda Seed, a campaigner with the nonprofit Center for Biological Diversity, told KUER this is the developers’ way of cleaning the slate of public comment because it will be like those protests “never happened.” 
Every protest is unique to the application it was filed against. 
“They're going to file in a couple of months, and we'll start over again, and people may be so angry about this that they’ll file again,” Seed said with a laugh. 
The proposed data center has drawn bipartisan outrage, she said. 
“I've been an organizer for a long time, and I've never seen as much energy coalescing in opposition to something so quickly as I have with this.” 
Macy Lipkin is a Report for America corps member who reports for KUER in northern U 
Confirmation Bias
10.6%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
21.2%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
10.9%
Loss Aversion
5.6%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
6.9%
Optimism Bias
12.1%
Pessimism Bias
9.7%
Negativity Bias
34.9%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
9.7%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
8.4%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
9.7%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
3.1%
Appeal to Emotion
13.7%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
12.8%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
19%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
12.1%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
10.6%
Quote-first Misdirection
0.6%
Biased Writer Voice
16.8%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

321 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.