KUER0%
Charlie Kirk assassination & other political violence mean pricier campaign security 46%
By Associated Press66%
4/9/2026, 9:03:46 PM
Topics: Political Violence, Campaign Security
BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 127 hits. Analysis detected 1,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 570 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.2% and a BS Rank of 46% (9,084 of 16,813 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the article peer group.
Security spending for congressional and presidential campaigns has jumped fivefold over the past decade as an increasingly hostile political environment has led to escalating threats against public officials, ranging from doxing to assassination plots, according to a report released Thursday.
Federal political committees spent more than $40 million on expenses labeled as security during the 2023-24 campaign cycle, the most recent one for which data is publicly available, according to the report from the Public Service Alliance, a nonpartisan group that focuses on security for public officials.
The report did not specify which candidates spent the most on security.
The tally also did not count the escalating security costs of the federal government, which includes augmented Capitol Police services for members of Congress and heightened U.S.
Secret Service protection for presidential candidates, as well as former and current presidents and their families.
It comes after a grim roll call of political violence over the past decade.
That includes the assassinations last year of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk in Utah and of a Democratic Minnesota state lawmaker; the 2024 assassination attempt on Republican then-candidate Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania rally; the 2022 hammer assault on the husband of Democratic then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in California and the 2017 shooting at a Republican congressional baseball team practice in Alexandria, Virginia.
“This is not a good place to be as a country,” said Justin Sherman, the report's author.
The report calculated security costs by looking at publicly available filings with the Federal Election Commission and tallied only the expenses that were explicitly marked for that purpose, even though other expenses may have a security component.
The total listed security spending represented a small fraction of the billions of dollars spent every two-year election cycle on presidential and congressional campaigns.
But Sherman noted that the report totals are conservative and likely understate the financial costs of security for political campaigns.
One of the biggest increases has been in the rapidly growing field of digital security, which includes protecting against hackers and monitoring online threats.
Spending went from $50,000 total in the 2015-16 election cycle to $900,000 in 2023-24.
Sherman noted one of the more disturbing findings is campaigns spending nearly $1 million on home security during the past decade, after spending nothing in that category during the 2015-16 election cycle.
That includes such expenses as contracts with response companies, window bars and surveillance cameras.
That's a reflection of the increased threats to public officials at their homes.
Critics are increasingly likely to post the home addresses of elected officials on social media, a practice known as doxing.
Attacks like the one on Pelosi's husband in San Francisco and on the Minnesota state lawmaker, Melissa Hortman, and her husband occurred at their homes.
“It's expected that, say, a GOTV event or a campaign rally is going to have metal detectors and security,” Sherman said.
But targeting the homes of candidates and officeholders is a new frontier.
He noted that members of Congress get money in their office budgets that can be used to pay for security, but people thinking of running for office now have to factor home security costs into their decision-making.
“It's a troubling time when the security spend is becoming a greater barrier for someone running for office,” Sherman said.
This story was written by Nicholas Riccardi of the Associated Press
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.