NBC News57%

Trump appeals ruling that found his $10 billion IRS suit aimed to ‘manipulate’ legal proceedings 4%

By Dareh Gregorian3% Kyla Guilfoil24%

7/31/2026, 4:39:06 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 367 faulty-reasoning hits from 481 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 12.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (24,472 of 25,265 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump on Friday took the first step in appealing a federal judge’s ruling that questioned the legality of a lawsuit filed by the president, two of his sons and the Trump Organization against the IRS. 
The Trumps filed notice that they would appeal the July 13 ruling by U.S. 
District Judge Kathleen Williams that said the $10 billion suit was for an “improper purpose.” 
The case led to the Justice Department creating a $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund as part of a settlement that included an agreement that the government would not investigate or seek any sort of payment from the president, his family members and companies on pending tax claims. 
The IRS did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the forthcoming appeal. 
A spokesperson for Trump’s legal team said Friday that the IRS “wrongly allowed a rogue, politically-motivated employee to leak private and confidential information about President Trump, his family, and the Trump Organization” to news outlets that was later “illegally released to millions of people.” 
A former IRS contractor pleaded guilty in 2023 to stealing Trump’s tax records and thousands of others in 2019 and 2020 before leaking them. 
He is serving a five-year prison term. 
The president sued the IRS and the Treasury Department in January over allegations that the agency was at fault for an unauthorized release of his tax documents that led to a report in The New York Times that said Trump had paid only $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017. 
In her ruling, Williams, a Barack Obama appointee, said Trump sued the IRS over his leaked tax records to “manipulate the judicial process” rather than to “vindicate rights.” 
She also pointed out that Trump has jurisdiction over the Justice Department, Treasury Department and the IRS. 
The ruling said the Justice Department could not portray the settlement with Trump as a judicial agreement. 
The judge also ordered sanctions against acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, a former personal lawyer to Trump, and Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward, in addition to asking the Florida Bar Association to consider whether disciplinary action was necessary for one of Trump’s attorneys, Alejandro Brito. 
The unprecedented settlement is at the center of a standoff between two Republican senators and the Justice Department that has stalled a vote on Blanche’s nomination for attorney general. 
Sens. 
John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Thom Tillis, R-N.C., have demanded that the DOJ agree to permanently shut down the “anti-weaponization” fund and narrow the audit protection deal before they will commit to advancing Blanche’s nomination. 
Trump on Friday morning acknowledged the fund is dead but told reporters, “I wish it weren’t.” 
He did not answer a question about whether he’d agree to limit the terms of the tax deal for himself, his family and his company. 
Confirmation Bias
0%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
0%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
9.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
3.3%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
9.1%
Self-Serving Bias
9.1%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
5.8%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
0%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
9.1%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
3.1%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
15%
Quote-first Misdirection
3.3%
Biased Writer Voice
9.1%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

481 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.