Mediaite67%

‘All I’m Thinking About Is Her Behind’: Greg Gutfeld’s AOC Punchline Falls Flat With Co-Hosts 70%

By Zoe Engels52%

7/21/2026, 12:59:34 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 884 faulty-reasoning hits from 507 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 63.8% and a BS Rank of 70% (5,739 of 18,982 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the article peer group.

Fox News host Greg Gutfeld tried his hand at a joke about Rep. 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (D-NY) “behind,” which bottomed out with his Five co-hosts. 
Gutfeld delivered his odd joke during a conversation among The Five co-hosts about Ocasio-Cortez’s accent at a Memphis rally for House candidate and Tennessee state Rep. 
Justin J. 
Pearson (D). 
They accused Ocasio-Cortez of breaking out a faux southern twang and heavy drawl during her speech. 
“We cannot afford to leave Tennessee behind,” she said in the speech. 
“We cannot afford to leave Kentucky behind, Alabama behind, Mississippi behind, Georgia behind, South Carolina behind.” 
Guest co-host Charlie Hurt said the incident helps prove Ocasio-Cortez is a “faker.” 
“I think that she is going to be the Democrat nominee because that’s where all of the energy is,” he offered up the prediction with which guest co-host Kennedy later disagreed. 
“And that’s exactly as far as she’ll get. 
She will not get any further because of exactly this because at the end of the day, she’s a faker.” 
Gutfeld later jumped in to deliver his punchline, with a particular focus on Ocasio-Cortez’s word choice instead of her hotly debated accent. 
“I think she’s an absolute genius,” he said sarcastically. 
“I want to read that quote again. 
I’m going to tell you why. 
Okay? 
‘We cannot afford to leave Tennessee behind, Kennedy behind, Alabama behind, Mississippi behind, Georgia behind, South Carolina behind.’ 
She mentions behind six times, and all I’m thinking about is her behind.” 
His joke was met largely with silence and a seemingly forced courtesy chuckle or two in the background. 
Gutfeld paused momentarily, presumably for more laughter than he received, before he continued: 
Look, I don’t know what she believes in, so I looked it up. 
Apparently her issues are Green New Deal. 
Remember that? 
Medicare for all, affordable housing, economic justice, criminal justice reform. 
So, I wanted to look up debates where she debated these topics, as you said. 
She’s only appeared in town halls, which is usually curated, campaign events, Congressional hearings where she gets to pose the questions. 
But there’s never a point where anyone asks her about the data or the outcomes, like nobody asks her about the the Amazon thing or how would this work? 
No one has ever asked her like, “Okay, when you close the jails”  it’s a really simple question  ‘what happens to the criminals? 
What happens to the victims? 
You oppose family separations of illegals, but what happens when the adult has to go to jail? 
How do you convince landlords to rent when you oppose evictions and background checks? 
How do you explain these things?’ 
She’s never had to explain anything, which is why almost everything she says isn’t memorable except for when she mentions her behind six times. 
Watch above via Fox News. 
The post ‘All I’m Thinking About Is Her Behind’: Greg Gutfeld’s AOC Punchline Falls Flat With Co-Hosts first appeared on Mediaite . 
Confirmation Bias
7.9%
Anchoring Bias
2.6%
Availability Heuristic
20.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
2.6%
Framing Effect
4.3%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
4.1%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
4.9%
Negativity Bias
13%
Self-Serving Bias
3.9%
Fundamental Attribution Error
2.6%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
7.7%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
3.9%
Hasty Generalization
29.6%
Red Herring
7.3%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
4.3%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
4.7%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
6.3%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
7.3%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
5.7%
Quote-first Misdirection
3.6%
Biased Writer Voice
26.4%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
1%

507 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.