BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hindsight Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 128 hits. Analysis detected 655 faulty-reasoning hits from 406 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55.2% and a BS Rank of 59% (9,100 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 58.40% of the article peer group.
Welcome to The Logoff: President Donald Trump has seemingly called off a nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia after his energy secretary already formally signed it.
What happened?
On Wednesday, the Trump administration formally concluded what’s called a “123 Agreement” to work with Saudi Arabia on the development of its civilian nuclear power infrastructure.
This kind of deal allows the United States to provide another country with nuclear fuel and equipment on the condition that they submit to safeguards against building a nuclear weapon.
But on Thursday morning, after the negotiations were quite literally concluded, Trump threw a monkey wrench into things — posting on Truth Social that the deal was “totally subject to Saudi Arabia joining the very respected and successful Abraham Accords.”
The Abraham Accords are a series of agreements from Trump’s first term that normalized diplomatic relations between Israel and some nearby Arab states.
In effect, then, Trump is saying that Saudi Arabia will not get its 123 Agreement unless it formally recognizes the State of Israel.
Which the Saudis are unwilling to do absent the creation of a Palestinian state.
Why is Trump doing this?
As is often the case with his strange last-minute decisions, no one really knows.
There are a few leading guesses, though.
The first is that the agreement with Saudi Arabia was a bad idea on the merits.
Experts on nuclear weapons, the Middle East, and international relations more broadly all said that the deal gave Saudis exactly what they wanted with virtually nothing in return, effectively surrendering a key piece of leverage Washington has on Riyadh.
The second is that other American friends in the Middle East got angry.
The Israelis are a leading candidate, as they have long opposed any agreement that might bring the Saudis closer to a nuke.
The Emiratis, often in competition with Saudis for regional influence, are another; their nuclear deal with the US, inked in 2009, is a lot stricter.
The third is bipartisan opposition in Congress, which would need to approve any deal.
What’s the takeaway: Unless something changes radically, Trump has blown up a nuclear deal that’s already been signed — humiliating his negotiators and angering the Saudis.
And with that, it’s time to log off…
As of today, we are officially two weeks away from the NFL’s first preseason game.
Our long national nightmare of calling soccer “football” is almost over.
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.