Vox52%

Did Trump fire someone trying to stop IRS abuses? 45%

By Andrew Prokop55%

7/17/2026, 10:25:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 850 faulty-reasoning hits from 417 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (10,008 of 17,926 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the article peer group.

This story appeared in The Logoff, a daily newsletter that helps you stay informed about the Trump administration without letting political news take over your life. 
Subscribe here. 
Welcome to The Logoff: President Donald Trump fired one of his own appointees who was reportedly trying to stop his team from illegally interfering with the IRS. 
What happened? 
Ken Kies headed tax policy at the Treasury Department and was simultaneously serving as the IRS’s top lawyer on an acting basis. 
But, according to the Wall Street Journal, he’s now been forced out. 
And his ouster comes after he’d clashed with White House officials over certain requests they were making about IRS audits  requests that, Kies believed, were illegal. 
Federal law prohibits the president and White House staffers from requesting, “directly or indirectly,” that the IRS “conduct or terminate an audit or other investigation of any particular taxpayer.” 
What was the White House trying to do? 
We don’t know yet. 
Possibilities include that they were requesting that certain people or groups, perhaps political enemies, be audited  or that they were trying to make ongoing audits of Trump’s allies go away. 
Do we know Kies was fired because of this? 
Not for sure. 
The Journal reports that administration officials and conservative activists had other complaints about Kies, including that he wasn’t working fast enough to roll back Biden-era regulations, and that he was cracking down on wealthy investors’ attempts to get huge tax breaks by not developing certain lands. 
What’s the takeaway? 
In 1971, President Richard Nixon privately told his aides that, atop the IRS, he wanted “a ruthless son of a bitch” that will “go after our enemies and not go after our friends.” 
When these and many other Nixon-era abuses came to light, new laws were passed, and new norms were established to prevent this. 
But these norms have been fraying. 
Indeed, Vice President JD Vance recently argued that Nixon’s scandals weren’t actually so bad and shouldn’t have taken down his presidency at all. 
And with that, it’s time to log off... 
The World Cup final between Spain and Argentina is this Sunday…or is it? 
That will depend on whether the wildfire smoke-ridden air in northern New Jersey (and much of the East Coast and Midwest) improves enough by then. 
Fingers crossed that it will, but while we wait, read Caitlin Dewey on how US cities had some of the unhealthiest air in the world this week. 
Confirmation Bias
13.9%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
10.8%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
5.3%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
12.7%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
9.6%
Pessimism Bias
3.1%
Negativity Bias
12.5%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
16.5%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
16.3%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
1.4%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
11%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
6%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
11.8%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
6.5%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
7.4%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
7%
Quote-first Misdirection
7.9%
Biased Writer Voice
7.9%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
11%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
12%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
13.2%

417 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.